General manager Ray Shero and Penguins ownership had not reached a decision on the future of coach Dan Bylsma or his staff as of Sunday.
Bylsma, who holds the franchise benchmarks for regular-season winning percentage and playoff victories, has one year remaining on his contract.
The favored Penguins were swept from the Eastern Conference final by the Boston Bruins on Friday.
Bylsma said Sunday he has not spoken with Shero about his job status.
Shero is scheduled to hold his annual season-in-review media session Wednesday. He did not speak Sunday because of a personal commitment in Canada.
Penguins players underwent end-of-season physicals and meetings with coaches Sunday at Consol Energy Center.
Some players — defenseman Kris Letang, for example — backed retaining Bylsma and assistants Tony Granato and Todd Reirden.
All players, including captain Sidney Crosby, said they had no knowledge of Shero's plans for Bylsma or members of his staff.
Shero praised Bylsma and the other coaches after a first-round victory over the New York Islanders.
The final decision to keep Bylsma, who led the Penguins to the Cup in 2009, will be Shero's, a representative of ownership told the Tribune-Review on Thursday.However, Shero is in consultation with majority co-owners Mario Lemieux and Ron Burkle and CEO David Morehouse.
The Penguins have spent to the NHL's salary cap since 2008. However, they have won only three playoff rounds since their Cup victory four years ago.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.