Staal trade did not set precedent for Letang
Jordan Staal was traded at the NHL Entry Draft a year ago.
That was no precedent for the Penguins' dealings with defenseman Kris Letang.
“This is different than the Staal negotiation,” general manager Ray Shero said Thursday. “But I don't have a crystal ball.”
Shero said there is no timetable to settle anything with Letang at the Entry Draft on June 30 or by the start of free-agent season July 5.
Letang is in a similar spot to Staal from last June: set to enter the final year of his current contract, permitted by the labor contract to agree on a new deal and projected to receive a big raise.
Unlike Staal last season, Letang has not informed the Penguins he is intent on playing out the final year of his deal.
That much was reiterated to Shero by Letang's agent, Kent Hughes, during a meeting Wednesday in Boston. More meetings with Hughes are planned because the Penguins have not ruled out keeping Letang.
They had ruled out keeping Staal, who had rejected a 10-year contract offer, leading up to the Entry Draft last summer.
The Penguins have not presented Letang with an offer, but they are preparing one.
Shero will spend the next several days “trying to have some preliminary discussions with some guys.”
That includes players due qualifying offers (example: defenseman Robert Bortuzzo), players due to become restricted free agents (example: winger Tyler Kennedy) and other players with only a year remaining on their current deals (example: defenseman Brooks Orpik).
Seven Penguins players are eligible to become unrestricted free agents, including top-line winger Pascal Dupuis. Shero and Dupuis' agent, Allan Walsh, have opened discussions on a potential new contract.
The Penguins have no intention of trading winger James Neal, who is signed for another five years at an annual cap hit of $5 million. Reports of interest from other clubs have surfaced.
Shero also does not plan to use either of the two compliance buyouts that are options to clubs looking to shed salary-cap space this and next summer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penguins’ Malkin: ‘We’re not a championship team’
- Penguins eliminated with Game 5 overtime loss to Rangers
- Fleury valiant in defeat
- Rangers’ defensive plan against Penguins was unwavering
- Penguins notebook: Lovejoy says individual play is problematic
- Rossi: This type of hockey is a serious problem
- Starkey: Tracing the Penguins’ demise
- Rossi: Rutherford falling apart, too
- Penguins notebook: Staal insists he never asked for trade to Penguins
- Rossi: Rutherford falling apart, too
- Penguins on brink of elimination after falling to Rangers in Game 4