Penguins notebook: Waiting game will play out early in draft
NEWARK, N.J. — The Penguins face a long Sunday.
They do not pick until Round 3 of the NHL Entry Draft, which will play out over the course of one day at Prudential Center.
General manger Ray Shero would like to change that.
“I think it will be hard to get into the first round this year,” Shero said, citing clubs' lack of willingness to move first-round picks in an entry draft perceived as deep.
“But the second round, there's a chance we could get a second-round pick somewhere. If we could do that, I'd like to.”
Trades during the season for winger Jarome Iginla and defenseman Douglas Murray cost Ray Shero his first- and second-round picks.
Also, Shero said, trading a first-round pick for Iginla was less distressing because of a move he made one year ago. Shero's trade of center Jordan Staal at the entry draft last summer netted him an extra first-round pick, which they used to draft defenseman Derrick Pouliot.
The deadline to extend qualifying offers to restricted free agents is Tuesday. Shero said the Penguins likely will beat it, mostly because it is easiest to file the paperwork at the entry draft.
Wingers Tyler Kennedy and Harry Zolnierczyk, forward Dustin Jeffrey and defenseman Robert Bortuzzo will be tendered offers, but Shero said he is hopeful of also reaching multiyear deals with some of those players.
The Penguins and winger Pascal Dupuis are far apart on a contract that would prevent him from becoming a free agent Friday.
Shero and Allan Walsh, Dupuis' agent, met Friday. However, the Penguins believe Dupuis will test the open market — that is why they signed winger Chris Kunitz to a three-year contract Thursday.
They continue to negotiate with winger Craig Adams.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.