The Penguins have re-signed two of their finest contributors at Wilkes-Barre/Scranton (AHL) to two-way contracts.
Given the current lack of depth at the NHL level on the third and fourth lines, forwards Zach Sill and Paul Thompson might have an opportunity to play with the Penguins at some point during the 2013-14 season.
Two members of the Penguins organization told the Tribune-Review in June that, of the forwards currently at Wilkes-Barre, Sill was the closest to playing in the NHL. There is nothing noteworthy about the forward's statistics — he produced just four goals and nine points in 57 AHL games last season — but the Penguins believe he is capable of becoming a capable, grinding fourth-line player in the NHL.
He has played 259 career AHL games.
Sill, 25, is a native of Truro, Nova Scotia.
Thompson, 24, also has become an intriguing prospect. He scored 20 goals in only 58 games with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton last season, despite playing alongside a forward unit that wasn't exactly dripping with NHL talent once forward Beau Bennett was recalled to Pittsburgh.
An undrafted free agent, Thompson, a Massachusetts native, has racked up 31 goals in 131 career AHL games.
Sill and Thompson both signed contracts that would be worth $550,000 at the NHL level.
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.