Penguins notebook: Lively crowd takes in practice
Sunday practices at Consol Energy Center usually aren't lively. This one was different. More than 4,500 people participated in Sunday's 6.6K Run & Family Walk earlier in the morning and were invited to watch practice. Just about all of the participants accepted the Penguins' offer, making for a raucous atmosphere. Nearly 4,000 fans and 200 volunteers came close to filling half of Consol's lower bowl during the hourlong workout. The 6.6K event was a success despite the unseasonably warm, muggy weather that greeted runners. All proceeds go directly to the cancer research and patient-care initiatives of the Mario Lemieux Foundation and the youth hockey initiatives of the Pittsburgh Penguins Foundation.
• Although defenseman Kris Letang is skating again, he isn't practicing with teammates. Letang injured his knee during a practice in West Point, N.Y., more than a week ago. He remains eligible to come off the injured reserve list for Tuesday's game against Carolina, but there remains little indication he will play that night.
• Center Dustin Jeffrey injured himself Saturday against New Jersey when his face appeared to hit the back of right wing Chuck Kobasew's skate. A day later, Jeffrey said he still wasn't sure how the injury occurred but was relieved not to have lost any teeth.
• The Penguins, who won't practice Monday, worked extensively on their power play in practice. They are 0 for 3 with the man-advantage through two games.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.