Rossi: Hockey fans not so sunny in Philadelphia
The Philadelphia Flyers are lousy. How are they this bad, though?
Winners just once in their opening eight games, the Flyers were minus-13 in goal differential and 24th in overall goals-against before NHL games played Saturday.
Traditionally, the player between the pipes has been blamed for the Flyers' seasons that have ended without the Stanley Cup returning to Philadelphia.
Well, the Cup is not coming back this summer, and will be a 39th season without a title will probably stretch into the 40s because of the Flyers' real problem.
Their culture, and a big part of that is haphazard management.
General manager Paul Holmgren is reputable for correcting problems with aggressive moves, but there are too many things to fix for this season — and the list of problems is only going to grow.
Consider arguably the Flyers' best player: center Claude Giroux, who was signed to an eight-year extension in the offseason. He will count $8.275 million against the salary cap on that contract.
Giroux never has scored 30 goals in any season, has topped 75 points only twice, and — though it is early — appears to be yet another young Flyers captain not suited for that role (see: Eric Lindros and Mike Richards).
Two years ago, after his brilliant performance in Round 1 of a playoff series, Flyers brass seemed to genuinely believe Giroux had surpassed Penguins captain Sidney Crosby as the world's best player. Two years later, Giroux might crack a list of the top 10 players in the Metropolitan Division.
He is very good, not great. He is not — as are Crosby and Evgeni Malkin, Alex Ovechkin (Capitals), Henrik Lundqvist (Rangers) and Eric Staal (Hurricanes) — a franchise player.
This is not to suggest the signing of Giroux was a disaster by the Flyers.
They did commit too much for too long to him, though.
They always do.
Defensemen Braydon Coburn ($4.5 million), Luke Schenn ($3.6 million) and Nicklas Grossmann ($3.5 million) are all signed for two more years, and each will count more against Flyers' future caps than Rob Scuderi, who returned to the Penguins as a free agent for an annual hit of $3.375 million.
Scuderi has played a pivotal shutdown role for two Cup winners.
The Flyers will spend $4.5 million on a past-his-prime Vincent Lecavalier for the next four seasons. Scott Hartnell will cost $4.75 million over each of the next five years.
Holmgren has the right idea in identifying core players, but he has not picked the right players to comprise a core.
That is why it is very much not sunny regarding the future of the hockey club in Philadelphia.
Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.