ShareThis Page

Penguins' Crosby skeptical of maintaining torrid pace

| Sunday, Oct. 20, 2013, 10:03 p.m.
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby takes the puck form the Oilers' Jordan Eberie in the second period Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2013 at Consol Energy Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby takes the puck form the Oilers' Jordan Eberie in the second period Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2013 at Consol Energy Center.

Sidney Crosby shakes his head and says no.

The rest of the hockey world is just shaking its head.

Through about 10 percent of the season, Crosby is averaging more than two points per game, something that hasn't been done for an entire season since Mario Lemieux did it in 1995-96.

Can it be done in a lower-scoring, more defensively sophisticated NHL?

“I don't think so,” Crosby said.

Crosby said he believes goaltenders are too good and defenses are too schooled for anyone to produced two points per game.

“I think it's a pretty different league now,” he said. “You don't see it very often. I don't see it happening. There are no surprises with everyone being able to prepare the way they can. It would be a very difficult thing to do.”

But would it be impossible? One of Crosby's linemates isn't so sure.

Left wing Chris Kunitz has played more games on Crosby's line than anyone. They have skated together for parts of six seasons, and Kunitz believes his center has reached a different, perhaps historical, level.

“I don't really know that there's anything that Sid isn't capable of right now,” Kunitz said.

Crosby's recent numbers suggest a flirtation with two points per game for a season is possible.

Three seasons ago, before Crosby's season ended prematurely because of a bout with concussion symptoms, he was averaging 1.6 points per game, the best mark of his career at that time.

Although he saw limited action in the 2011-12 season, he produced 1.68 points per game.

Last season, before missing the final 12 regular-season games and one playoff game with a broken jaw, Crosby overcame a pedestrian start to finish with a league-leading 1.5 points per game.

“He's really on top of his game,” Kunitz said. “The way he's skating, protecting the puck, seeing the ice — he's doing it all.”

The game certainly has changed since Lemieux and Wayne Gretzky — the only players to reach two points per game in the past 93 years — accomplished the feat routinely.

Gretzky peaked at 2.77 points per game in 1985, when more than eight goals were scored in the average game.

During most of Crosby's era, including this season, about 5.5 goals are scored per game. Still, he ranks fourth — behind Gretzky, Lemieux and Mike Bossy — on the all-time points-per-game list with a 1.43 mark.

Regardless of whether he comes close to the accomplishment, Crosby is receiving accolades from his coach.

“It's a question I don't ever entertain,” Dan Bylsma said when asked whether Crosby could reach two points per game for the season. “Some of the impressiveness is that I don't think (the points) are done out of flash or looking for more points. It's playing good, hard, honest hockey.”

Crosby had a point taken away in Philadelphia on Thursday and missed an opportunity for an empty-netter Tuesday against Edmonton, proof that he hasn't maximized his number of possible points.

There is also the reality that October is historically Crosby's second-worst scoring month.

“He's so good right now,” Kunitz said. “We'll see.”

Josh Yohe is a staff writer at Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.