Share This Page

Penguins notebook: Improvement sought on penalty kill

| Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013, 7:36 p.m.

• The Penguins are satisfied with most aspects of their game. However, the penalty-killing unit has been adequate at best. They led the NHL in penalty killing during the 2010-11 season, but their current standing of 18th isn't sitting well. “I think it's been pretty inconsistent,” right wing Craig Adams said. “It started out pretty well, but then we ran into teams that traditionally give us problems. It hurt our numbers, and, to be honest, we just haven't found our groove yet.” The Penguins have plenty of excuses for their penalty-killing issues. In the past two offseasons, they have lost two of the league's premier penalty killers: Jordan Staal and Matt Cooke. Defenseman Rob Scuderi, among the league's finest penalty-killing blue-liners, broke his ankle. “We've just been out of sync a little bit here and there,” right wing Pascal Dupuis said. “And sometimes, that's all it takes to be in trouble.”

• Left wing Chris Kunitz is nursing an injury, given that Monday's “maintenance day” was followed by another missed day of practice. Kunitz made the trip to New York, and coach Dan Bylsma said that the left wing is “probable” to play against the Rangers. Bylsma also said if Kunitz is unable to play on Wednesday, the Penguins would not promote anyone from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.

• Right wing James Neal skated before practice at Southpointe for a second straight day, but he hasn't yet resumed practicing with the team. … Left wing Beau Bennett practiced for a second straight day but isn't expected to play in New York.

•Penguins prospects Josh Archibald and Jake Guentzel were named their respective collegiate conference players of the week. Also, Penguins' 2012 first-round pick Derrick Pouliot was named to Team WHL for the Canada-Russia Subway Super Series.

— Josh Yohe

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.