Share This Page

Winger Bennett's return to ice could help to propel Penguins' 3rd line

| Monday, Nov. 11, 2013, 10:24 p.m.
Getty Images
Penguins winger Beau Bennett, shown in action Oct. 12, 2013, against the Lightning, likely will spend time on the third line for the time being.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Beau Bennett keeps Paul Thompson at bay during a scrimage on Friday, Sept. 12, 2013 at Consol Enrgy Center.

Beau Bennett is looking to carry it.

The puck that is, not the Penguins' offensive load — though the opportunity is there for that, too.

“I want to be able to carry the play at times, set up plays, create offense and get guys open,” Bennett said Monday after a lengthy practice at Southpointe Iceoplex.

The Penguins could use any or all of that from Bennett, who played for the first time in 11 games on Saturday night in a loss at St. Louis. They have split their past 10 games — only two of which have featured a goal from captain Sidney Crosby and none with goals from center Evgeni Malkin or right winger Pascal Dupuis.

Those are three of the Penguins' top five forwards.

Bennett, a second-year winger, seems suited — “Beau has high-end, like, elite skill,” winger Matt D'Agostini said — for a top-six slot, but the Penguins have plans for him on their third line.

Coach Dan Bylsma's thinking is that Bennett can do for that third line what Crosby and Malkin do for the top scoring units: dictate, distribute and — usually, though not recently — score.

Bennett returned Saturday to play as the right wing on a third line with center Brandon Sutter and D'Agostini at the left side. Those players combined for six of the Penguins' season-low 37 attempted shots, or about 16 percent.

It was a start, anyway.

Those three players — projected by coaches to form the third line at the start of training camp — had not played together in the Penguins' previous 16 games because of injuries to Bennett and D'Agostini.

Sutter, an admitted “two-way” center whose strength is defensive positioning, has played with eight wingers. The belief among coaches is that his straight-ahead offensive game — and an underutilized whip-shot — will benefit from Bennett's high-level vision, soft hands and penchant for making something out of nothing.

“It's a different look to what I had last year for wingers, for sure,” Sutter said, referring to grinders Matt Cooke and Tyler Kennedy before the latter was replaced by Brenden Morrow.

“The main thing is we still have to be a hard forechecking line and playing responsible in our own end. But anybody who plays with me probably already knows that. But when I'm playing with guys like Beau and ‘Dags,' there's definitely going to be a chance for our line to create more offense for this team.”

The Penguins, still haunted by scoring only two goals in a four-game sweep from the Eastern Conference final, are all about finding more offense.

That is partly why Bylsma implemented a neutral-zone based defensive system, the left-wing lock. He envisions a more transition-based attack that can supplement his most skilled forwards' natural puck-possession tendencies.

The Penguins want to establish a third line that can play a factor in the playoffs, as Jordan Staal's line did on the Stanley Cup Final runs in 2008 and '09. Also, coaches suspect Bennett will develop more naturally as a go-to guy on his own line.

Bennett, only 21 and with just 32 games of NHL experience, has embraced this proposal for him.

“When I'm playing top-six, it's more read and react. In this position, it's nice to carry the puck more, make plays on my own,” he said, noting his practice focus on holding the puck longer so a scoring opportunity can develop.

“When you look at the Penguins, they have their most success when the third line is a factor. So, we're going to need that, too.”

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at rrossi@tribweb.com or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.