Penguins notebook: Letang, Martin return to lineup
The two defensemen who eat the most minutes in the Penguins' lineup were available Friday night after some uncertainty.
Defenseman Paul Martin was injured Nov. 6 against the Rangers but returned against the Predators. He pronounced himself healthy before the game.
“I've felt good the last couple of days,” Martin said.
Martin went nearly a week without skating. He worked on his conditioning while making sure he was no longer skating in discomfort during workouts the past two days.
“I hadn't skated since the Rangers game,” he said. “It's not the same as playing in a game, but I feel back to 100 percent.”
Kris Letang, dealing with an illness from the previous day, missed the Penguins' morning skate but played Friday night.
• The Penguins played only three games from Nov. 3-14. They play 10 times in the final 16 days in November. “The players probably don't enjoy playing so few games in that number of days,” coach Dan Bylsma said. The Penguins were on a roll in the spring before an eight-day layoff prior to the Eastern Conference final slowed their offense, as they scored twice in four games. “Getting a day off or practice time is good, but they're not into the flow of games right now,” Bylsma said. “We're looking forward to playing a lot of games, and we're about to get a big dose of that. We like that a lot more. We used practice time to work on certain things. But it's time to go.”
• The Penguins recalled forward Zach Sill from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton on Friday, but he was not in the lineup. With the team's AHL affiliate in Syracuse, the Penguins wanted a player available for Friday and Saturday's game in Newark. Sill has never played in an NHL game. He has scored 25 goals in 218 career games with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.