Penguins notebook: Ducks' Selanne says Maatta deserves spot on Finland Olympic team
• Teemu Selanne hadn't seen Penguins defenseman Olli Maatta play until Monday. But Selanne received an early scouting report, and he believes Maatta could be a valuable figure for Finland in February's Winter Olympics in Sochi. “I've never seen this guy,” Selanne said. “But (former NHL enforcer) Tie Domi is a good buddy of mine and tells me about him. It's a great, great story. It's not too typical for a Finnish guy to come to the NHL this way. Usually you get drafted and come to the NHL when you're ready.” At 19, can Maatta thrive on the Olympic stage? “Oh, I think so,” Selanne said. “If you can play in the NHL, you can play in the Olympics. We don't have so many defensemen in the NHL right now.” Domi's son, Max, was a teammate of Maatta's at London (OHL). Maatta was thrilled to hear about Selanne's praise. “That's awesome that he said that,” Maatta said.
• Ducks coach Bruce Boudreau said Whitehall native John Gibson, the team's second round pick in 2011, is on the verge of being a special NHL goaltender. He is playing for Norfolk in the AHL. “His future is like a supernova star,” Boudreau said. “He's going to be a solid, solid NHL goaltender for many years. We don't want to rush him, and we have quality goalies here. The more experience he gets in the AHL, the better he'll be.”
• The Penguins inserted forward Brian Gibbons into the lineup Monday — one day after recalling him from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton (AHL), where he led the team with 22 points in 15 games. Monday's game was his first in the NHL.
• Defenseman Robert Bortuzzo and right wing Matt D'Agostini were healthy scratches Monday.
— Josh Yohe
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.