No-huddle option not a full-time luxury for Steelers
It looks so easy.
Line up Ben Roethlisberger in a no-huddle formation, with minimal time between plays. Allow him to call his favorite plays — nearly all of them passes — and the Steelers' offense dictates to the defense, rather than the other way around.
What's not to like?
Only it isn't nearly that simple, Roethlisberger and coach Mike Tomlin explained Tuesday — two days after the Steelers began their 37-27 win over the Lions by driving for two quick touchdown passes to Antonio Brown out of the no-huddle.
Because Roethlisberger often looks most comfortable calling his own plays in the no-huddle, he often gets asked why the Steelers don't employ it as their primary offense.
Tomlin said it's much more than a one-man operation.
“There is a menu of plays decided upon collectively during the course of the week, and he is simply picking from that menu,” Tomlin said. “We're not there unscripted, leaving him up to his devices, even though he's fully capable — that wouldn't be fair to him. ... It's not like it's a different set of plays.”
Offensive coordinator Todd Haley decided early last week to open up in the no-huddle as a way of jump-starting a team that had scored only 19 points in the first quarter all season.
Tomlin liked the idea because it meant the Lions' two large and dominant defensive linemen, Ndamukong Suh and Nick Fairley, were forced to play at a faster pace than they like.
“We drove down the first two series, and we stayed in it a lot throughout the game,” said Roethlisberger, who threw 25 of his 45 passes out of the no-huddle.
But the Steelers (4-6) didn't always stay in the up-tempo no-huddle they used to begin the game.
“There are multiple, different ways to run it,” Roethlisberger said on his weekly radio show. “There's no-huddle that's just typical; you slow it down, you see things, you take all the play clock you need. There's the up-tempo where you're just calling a play and you're living with it. ... And there's the two-minute, which is how fast can you get a play off.”
The Steelers started off in the middle-paced no-huddle, then switched to the more deliberately paced version later in the game.
Roethlisberger's comfort level in the no-huddle is obvious, yet statistics show he is just as capable a quarterback while lining up under center.
For the season, he is 184 of 283 (65 percent) for 2,189 yards, 11 touchdowns, seven interceptions and 27 sacks out of the shotgun formation, which is always employed during the no-huddle and also is used on passing downs in the base offense.
When he lines up under center, Roethlisberger is 63 of 100 (63 percent) for 712 yards, six touchdowns, three interceptions and seven sacks.
When there are two minutes or less remaining in a half or the game, Roethlisberger is 37 of 57 (64.9 percent) for 416 yards, four touchdowns, one interception and three sacks.
Tomlin said no team can become overly reliant on a system that permits only minimal communication between the quarterback and coaches between plays. He also said defenses often adjust quickly to the no-huddle when they begin seeing it play after play.
“You've got to be very cautious about employing it, how much you employ it, how you change your verbal communication,” said Tomlin, suggesting that TV cameras can pick up play call signals from the bench. “There are a lot of things that are capable of limiting your ability to run the no-huddle, besides your willingness.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.