Penguins notebook: Scuderi making progress in wake of broken ankle
Might the Penguins receive a Christmas present in the form of defenseman Rob Scuderi?
It certainly seems possible.
Scuderi, one of the NHL's finest defensive defensemen, suffered a broken ankle in Toronto on Oct. 26. At the time, the Penguins were informed by doctors that Scuderi would miss six-to-eight weeks. Nothing that has transpired since that point indicates that Scuderi is behind schedule.
“Rob was three weeks post surgery yesterday,” coach Dan Bylsma said. “He's rehabbing at a moderate rate right now. Hopefully in the next seven days or so, he'll move on to a little more rehab as he progresses.”
Bylsma said it is too early to pinpoint a return date for Scuderi but sounded optimistic that the rehabilitation is going nicely.
“Generally we gave it six to eight weeks when he got injured,” Bylsma said. “There's no definitive update on that.”
• Bylsma ran an optional practice on Thursday at Southpointe. Five players took part, including defenseman Robert Bortuzzo, goaltender Jeff Zatkoff and forwards Matt D'Agostini, Brian Gibbons and Zach Sill. The practice was a relaxed one, and the final 20 minutes saw the five players have a contest seeing which could hit the empty net from the opposite side of the rink with the most frequency.
• Bylsma said that goaltender Tomas Vokoun, out since September with a blood clot problem, remains on blood-thinning medication and that there is no update on his health. Vokoun said he is out three-to-six months, with the three-month figure representing an extremely optimistic forecast.
• Forward Chuck Kobasew, who has been out three weeks with a lower-body injury, has skated three times during the past week and could be getting close to practicing with the Penguins.
— Josh Yohe
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.