ShareThis Page

Power play, penalty kill help put Penguins on another 100-point pace

| Thursday, Dec. 12, 2013, 10:15 p.m.
NHLI via Getty Images
Craig Adams headshot

James Neal's negligent knee and Brooks Orpik's battered brain brought the Penguins back to their customary spot atop the NHL's hot list.

Now a spotlight is on a club that, despite injuries that have placed no fewer than five AHL regulars on the 23-man roster for the past month, is tracking toward another 100-point season under coach Dan Bylsma. It would be the Penguins' fourth in as many full seasons under Bylsma.

Before games played Thursday night, the Penguins were:

• Fifth in win (21) and average goals against (2.22)

• Sixth in points (43) and average goals (3.00)

• Second in penalty kill (86.8 percent) and first in power play (26.1 percent)

That — in addition to three 30-point scorers (Sidney Crosby, 43; Evgeni Malkin, 38; and Chris Kunitz, 31) — is what awaits the New Jersey Devils at Consol Energy Center on Friday night.

The Penguins were one of only 11 clubs — joining only Boston and Tampa Bay in the Eastern Conference — with a 5-on-5 goals for/against ratio above 1.10, ranking 11th at 1.11.

They were at 1.35 in that category last season, but despite a drop-off, they keep winning because they are special when the advantage is with or against them.

“Whatever your strengths are as a team, you're going to, hopefully, be able to rely on those in times of adversity or when guys are out of the lineup,” winger Craig Adams said after a practice at Southpointe on Thursday.

Orpik will become the eighth regular to miss at least two games because of an injury. That does not include backup goalie Tomas Vokoun, who has yet to play this season.

Crosby said rankings shape outside opinions about special teams, but he is pleased with their performances.

“We've realized that, most times, that's the game,” Crosby said. “If you can be on the plus side of that, you at least give yourself a chance to win hockey games.”

The Penguins have won the special-teams battle in 15 games. They have played it even in 12.

Without defenseman Rob Scuderi, who has missed the past 20 games, they have killed 55 of 59 penalties. They have allowed opponents only one goal on 20 power-play chances in seven consecutive games also missed by defenseman Paul Martin.

Bylsma's current options for penalty-killing defensemen include a rookie 19-year-old (Olli Maatta), a defenseman who spent about 10 games as a forward (Deryk Engelland) and a former first-round pick who had failed to win a job in training camp (Simon Despres).

Marc-Andre Fleury has helped in a big way as the only NHL goalie to play in 16 or more games and stop at least 92 percent of shots faced while his team is shorthanded. He has turned aside 99 of 107 power-play shots for a .930 save percentage.

A goalie has to be a club's best penalty killer, as Adams noted.

Any power play would benefit from a true sniper such as Neal, who has 32 goals on the advantage the past three seasons.

Neal missed 15 of the opening 16 games, and the Penguins went 12 of 58 (20.7 percent) on the power play in that stretch. However, eight of those games were missed by power-play regular Kris Letang, whose fellow point partner, Malkin, was off to a slow start — 13 points in games Neal had missed.

Also, while all of that was going on, the Penguins were implementing a new defensive system that Bylsma said required a new approach from forwards.

“We've been able to play good defense, limit teams' opportunities,” Bylsma said. “I also think you've seen special teams be a big factor.”

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.