Stats Corner: Penguins rookies earning their keep
Through injuries, suspensions and ever-changing line combinations, the Penguins just keep winning.
The Penguins lead the Eastern Conference with 55 points and have outscored the competition by 38 goals, trailing just the St. Louis Blues. While the club's established stars deserve plenty of praise, the Penguins wouldn't hold a double-digit point lead in the Metropolitan Division and a top playoff seed without a cadre of rookies playing like seasoned veterans.
Seven rookies have suited up for the Penguins already this season, playing crucial minutes and cushioning the blow of losing coach Dan Bylsma's top four projected defensemen and backup goalie, among others. You wouldn't know that these youngsters just ascended from junior hockey or stepped off a bus from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton based on their production.
Penguins rookies have racked up a collective 5.5 Point Shares (PS), which measures the number of standings points that a player contributes to his team through his offensive and defensive value. Only the Anaheim Ducks have benefited more from NHL neophytes.
Team Rookie PS
Penguins rookies are proving to be catalysts between the pipes and on the blue line. Backup goalie Jeff Zatkoff (1.3 PS) has filled in admirably for Tomas Vokoun, helping Marc-Andre Fleury stay fresh as he re-establishes himself as one of the game's elite net minders. Olli Maatta, a 19-year-old defenseman who skated for the London Knights of the Ontario Hockey League last year, ranks third among rookies in Point Shares.
Player Team PS
Tomas Hertl Sharks 3.9
Hampus Lindholm Mighty Ducks 3.2
Olli Maatta Penguins 3.0
Martin Jones Kings 2.7
Marek Mazanec Predators 2.7
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.