Tanner Glass has the doctor's approval. He just needs to be able to trust his body.
Rob Scuderi has the opposite issue.
Each is progressing toward a return. Winger Glass (broken hand) and defenseman Scuderi (broken ankle) participated in Friday's practice.
Although neither officially was ruled out, it is unlikely either will play against the Flames on Saturday afternoon.
“Tanner is progressing back to play, I think, a little bit quicker than Rob is (by) maybe a game or two,” coach Dan Bylsma said.
Glass has missed 13 consecutive games, and Scuderi hasn't played since Oct. 26. Glass said he has been medically cleared, and although he added that playing Saturday “is a possibility,” he didn't sound too optimistic.
“It's really uncomfortable right now with a stick in my hand,” Glass said, “and if it feels weak and feels like it's not stable in my hand, I don't want to put myself and the team in a situation where maybe I'm not at my best out there and can hurt the team, especially with things going so good right now. I don't want to jinx anything or screw it up.”
Scuderi said he “feels good” and is “as close as I can be” to playing. But awaiting doctor's clearance for absorbing contact comes first.
Malkin out Saturday
Although he skated on his own beforehand, Evgeni Malkin did not practice Friday and will not play Saturday.
Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.