Penguins untouchable at home this season
In the NHL, as in real estate, location is everything. Teams get a major boost when playing at home, collecting 61.2 percent of their total possible game points this season compared to 51.7 percent on the road. The Penguins' home-ice advantage is even greater, with opponents traveling to Consol Energy Center all but guaranteed defeat in 2013-14.
The Penguins have a 17-3-0 record at home, including a 10-game winning streak dating to mid-November. No Eastern Conference team has racked up a higher points percentage on home ice, and only the Anaheim Ducks and San Jose Sharks have outpaced them in the West.
Home sweet home
Team Home points pct.
At home, the Penguins are outscoring opponents by 1.4 goals per game. On the road, they're scoring just slightly more than they give up (plus-0.15 goal differential).
Coach Dan Bylsma's squad is thriving at Consol by taking care of the puck (6.2 giveaways per game at home compared to 8.2 on the road), missing fewer shots (10.3 per game at home, 12.3 on the road) and punishing opponents on defense (26.6 hits per game in Pittsburgh, 25.5 elsewhere).
The 2013-14 Penguins are dominating at home like no team in the franchise's 46-year history. So far, they easily boast a better home points percentage than the early-to-mid-1990s Penguins led by Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr and Ron Francis.
Year Home points pct.
1974-75, 2012-13 75.0
David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.