ShareThis Page

Penguins at best against West

| Friday, Jan. 31, 2014, 11:12 p.m.
The Penguins' Tanner Glass throws a check on the Kings' Slava Voynov in the third period Thursday, Jan. 30, 2014, at Staples Center in Los Angeles.
Getty Images
The Penguins' Tanner Glass throws a check on the Kings' Slava Voynov in the third period Thursday, Jan. 30, 2014, at Staples Center in Los Angeles.

GLENDALE, Ariz. — Rob Scuderi spent the previous four seasons playing in a Western Conference known for black-and-bruise hockey that has produced five of the past seven Stanley Cup champions.

Such hockey should not favor a Penguins team built on skill and speed, but it hasn't played out that way.

The problem for Western teams starts with centers Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin, Scuderi said.

“There's not too many teams in the league that can put two MVP-caliber players against you every shift,” Scuderi said. “It's tough to match up against if you don't see it all the time.”

Scuderi, a stay-at-home defenseman, joined the Los Angeles Kings after the Penguins won the Stanley Cup in 2009. The Penguins have not returned to the Final since and have won only three of seven playoff series.

That may be because they cannot get away from Eastern Conference clubs — built specifically to hang with them — in the postseason. If the Penguins could just get back to the Cup Final, they might fare well.

They are an East-best 11-3-1 against the West this season and were 33-13-8 in three previous full seasons under coach Dan Bylsma. (The club stayed in conference for all 48 games of the lockout-shortened season in 2013).

The Penguins can continue their Western winning ways against Phoenix on Saturday Night at Arena.

Style points do not win games. Contrasting styles do, though, winger Tanner Glass said.

“If we look at a team we're probably going to have to (beat) come playoff time, it's Boston,” Glass said. “A team that is a big, physical team probably presents more of a challenge.”

It is one to which the Penguins mostly have risen, as they did Thursday night with a 4-1 victory at Los Angeles. The Kings are the NHL's top defensive club and known to play a heavy game.

The Penguins scored first, then used two power-play goals to break a 1-1 tie in the first period.

They were up by three goals near the midpoint of the second period, and the Kings often appeared worn down from chasing after pucks.

“When you know a team is physical, forechecks hard and their defense is going to pound on you, that kind of sets a tone,” winger Chris Kunitz said of the Kings, whose grinding ways are another hallmark of other Western contenders such as Anaheim and St. Louis and — when necessary — reigning champion Chicago.

Kunitz said “maybe” the allure of testing themselves against Western opponents brings a sharper focus for the Penguins “to dictate” early and “play more responsibly.”

Crosby said what pleased him most about the win at Los Angeles — the Cup winner in 2012 and a West finalist last postseason — was the Penguins willingness to pay a price to win battles for prime scoring real estate and continue to challenge offensively while avoiding risky passes when up by multiple goals late.

Scuderi said he hopes a willingness by the perceived “pretty Penguins” to play grueling hockey catches opponents off guard the rest of this season, which includes 13 more games against the West.

“It's something we're going to have to find a little bit more of in our game if we want to be successful later on,” Scuderi said. “You can't be a perimeter team when the chips are down.”

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.