Penguins notebook: Crosby not bothered by Olympic housing
As reports from Russia filtered in Tuesday about the cramped quarters of the Olympic Village for Canadian hockey players, many were aghast at the twin beds and three-to-a-room format.
Not Sidney Crosby, who gave a figurative shrug.
“Pretty similar to Vancouver,” he said, referring to the 2010 Games. “Not quite that tight, but we had three guys in a room, and I think (Boston Bruins star Patrice) Bergeron was sleeping in a closet. … To house that many athletes in that small a (town), it's probably what you're going to see.”
• Penguins players who were not selected for the Olympics are being encouraged by coach Dan Bylsma to “vacation” or “take a break.” The ways in which each will choose to do so varied. Center Brandon Sutter will go ice fishing. “Most guys think I'm crazy, but I'm looking forward to it,” he said. Count winger James Neal among them: “I'll find myself on a beach somewhere, relaxing and enjoying the time off.”
• Winger Taylor Pyatt will not play in either of the Penguins' final two games before the break, Bylsma said. Pyatt left Monday's game after one shift because of a lower-body injury. “We should have more information on him probably returning to practice (after the Olympics),” Bylsma said.
• Defenseman Kris Letang will miss his fourth consecutive game Wednesday. Bylsma said Letang was not accompanying the team to Buffalo and provided no update on his health.
• Forward Andrew Ebbett was re-assigned to the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins on Tuesday. Ebbett, who has one assist in seven games with the team, was scratched three of the past four games. Taking his roster spot was forward Harry Zolnierczyk, who was recalled Tuesday. Zolnierczyk has played in nine games for the Penguins this season.
• Defensemen Brooks Orpik and Robert Bortuzzo were given practice off as “maintenance days.”
— Chris Adamski
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.