NHL official says Neal won't be suspended
An NHL official told the Tribune-Review on Saturday that right wing James Neal will not be suspended despite receiving a third penalty for embellishment this season.
The rule that covers the possibility of embellishment leading to suspensions, Rule 64.3, is intended to cover incidents prompted by calls to players from Hockey Operations.
Although Neal has been in trouble with Hockey Operations this season — he was suspended for five games in December for kneeing Boston's Brad Marchand in the head — he never has received a call from the Director of Player Safety Brendan Shanahan regarding the embellishing penalties.
Had Neal received a warning call from Shanahan after one of the embellishing penalties — he was given the penalties in games against Edmonton, Phoenix and the Rangers this season — he would have been a candidate for a fine or suspension.
However, the league confirmed that Neal, who is vacationing in Mexico during the Olympic break, is not a candidate for an automatic fine or suspension.
3 forwards sent to AHL
The Penguins sent three players to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton to receive extra work during the Olympic break.
Forwards Brian Gibbons, Jayson Megna and Harry Zolnierczyk — who have provided sparks in recent weeks — will play in the AHL during the break.
The Penguins don't play again until Feb. 27 against Montreal.
Zolnierczyk must clear waivers to play in Wilkes-Barre. NHL teams have until noon to claim the former Flyers forward. Gibbons and Megna do not have to clear waivers.
Gibbons (four goals), Megna (four goals) and Zolnierczyk (two goals) have provided the Penguins with speed.
Although he isn't considered the long-term answer on the top line, Gibbons has acquitted himself well on Sidney Crosby's right wing. Megna and Zolnierczyk primarily have played in the bottom six.
Wilkes-Barre/Scranton will play eight games during the Olympic break.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.