Penguins' Malkin crashing net like no other
After beginning this season with a flurry of assists but few goals, Evgeni Malkin has picked up the scoring pace.
He notched just 0.25 goals per game in October and November, going a career-high 15 consecutive contests without lighting the lamp at one point, but his scoring average since (0.55 per game) bests his career mark (0.46) and beats out Sidney Crosby (0.52), James Neal (0.52) and Chris Kunitz (0.42) for top honors on the Penguins.
Renowned for his silky-smooth passes, Malkin is taking a more assertive approach with the puck (3.2 shots on goal per game since December) than he did during the season's first two months (2.86). You won't have to look far to find him, either. He's firing those shots in the goalie's face.
Malkin has the shortest average shot distance among NHL players who have scored double-digit goals this season, taking aim fewer than 22 feet away from the net-minder. That's about 15 feet closer than the average shot of Malkin's Olympic teammate and NHL goal leader, Alex Ovechkin, and the overall league average.
Player, team Avg. shot (feet)
Evgeni Malkin, Penguins 21.8
Jonathan Toews, Blackhawks 22.3
John Tavares, Islanders 22.4
Andrew Shaw, Blackhawks 23.5
Tomas Hertl, Sharks 23.6
NHL average 36.4
No Penguin crashes the net like Malkin, but the club's other top scoring threats also like to make goalies feel claustrophobic. Crosby, Neal and Kunitz take shots closer to the net than the average NHL player.
Player Avg. shot (feet)
Evgeni Malkin 21.8
Sidney Crosby 27.0
Chris Kunitz 29.3
James Neal 33.8
Jussi Jokinen 36.1
Team Avg. 36.0
David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.