Maatta dazzling with offense
With Kris Letang's health scare taking a perennial Norris Trophy contender out of the lineup and few forwards scoring aside from the Crosby-Kunitz-Malkin-Neal quartet, the Pens have turned to a 19-year-old Finn to spark the offense from the blue line.
Olli Maatta, a year removed from junior hockey, is displaying nearly unprecedented offensive talent for a teenaged defenseman.
After a modest start (he averaged .23 points in October and .13 in November), Maatta is besting goalies and setting up teammates like a contender for the Calder Trophy, given to the league's top rookie. His points-per-game total increased to .54 in December, .67 in January, and .73 during the Olympics-shortened month of February and March. Maatta boasts the highest points total among a bumper crop of scoring-savvy rookie defensemen.
Player Team Points
Olli Maatta Penguins 28
Jacob Trouba Jets 24
Hampus Lindholm Ducks 23
Seth Jones Predators 23
Morgan Rielly Blue Jackets 22
Maatta's scoring prowess at such a young age is even more impressive when considering that goals are scarce in today's NHL. Teams are averaging 2.76 goals per game in 2013-14, compared to nearly four per game during the early to mid 1980s.
While Maatta has 28 points so far, his adjusted points total, which accounts for league scoring levels, schedule length, and roster size, is 40. He's on pace for the fifth-best adjusted points total ever for a teenaged defenseman, trailing only seven-time All-Star Phil Housley and Hall of Famers Larry Murphy and Raymond Bourque. A look at the top players in adjusted points:
Player Team Year AP
Phil Housley Sabres 1983-84 61
Larry Murphy Kings 1980-81 59
Ray Bourque Bruins 1979-80 55
Phil Housley Sabres 1982-83 53
Olli Maatta Penguins 2013-14 51
Tyler Myers Sabres 2009-10 51
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.