Stats corner: Crosby cruising to another scoring title
The Art Ross Trophy is named after the legendary Boston Bruins coach and general manager, but the award's true home is Pittsburgh. Penguins center Sidney Crosby has all but locked up his second regular-season scoring title, building a 17-point lead over Anaheim's Ryan Getzlaf that would be the largest margin of victory since Jaromir Jagr bested Teemu Selanne by 20 points during the 1998-99 season.
Despite the franchise being founded two decades after the award was established in 1947-48, the Pens will have collected an NHL-best 15 Art Ross trophies once Crosby's title becomes official. That's six more than the second-place Canadiens and far ahead of other “Original Six” clubs including the Blackhawks, Bruins and Red Wings.
Crosby's raw points per game total (1.32) is plenty impressive. But it's even better considering the paucity of scoring in today's era of supersized goalies, shrunken nets and suffocating defensive schemes.
His adjusted points-per-game figure, which factors in league-wide scoring, roster size and schedule length, is 1.60. That tops Crosby's other Art Ross-winning season in 2006-07 (1.54 adjusted points), and matches up well with Evgeni Malkin's wins in 2011-12 (1.63 per game) and 2008-09 (1.43).
Crosby will need to go on a scoring binge to crack the top five in single-season adjusted points among all Pens' Art Ross Trophy winners:
Player Season Adj. Pts/G
Jaromir Jagr 1994-95 2.52
Mario Lemieux 1995-96 2.23
Mario Lemieux 1988-89 2.17
Mario Lemieux 1992-93 2.15
Mario Lemieux 1987-88 1.83
David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.