Sidney Crosby wants all the trophies.
Those are his words.
Disappointed after a broken jaw last season prevented him from winning the MVP and scoring title — and perhaps the Stanley Cup — Crosby told friends last summer of his objectives during his ninth season:
• Olympic gold medal
• Art Ross Trophy (top NHL scorer)
• Hart Trophy (MVP)
• Conn Smythe (playoff MVP)
• Stanley Cup
Oh, and Crosby wanted to play every possible game — six at the Olympic tournament, and 82 for the first time in the NHL.
All that Crosby has done since declaring he would “win all the trophies” is go about doing it.
He captained Canada to gold (again) at the Olympics in February. He hit the 100-point mark Tuesday night and held a 17-point lead in the scoring race with two weeks remaining in the regular season. He has played in every game for a Penguins team that is in first place despite losing 479 man-games to injury — the most in the NHL by 100.
Crosby entered the league as “The Next One,” a title bestowed upon him by Wayne “The Great One” Gretzky when Crosby was a teenager. Mario Lemieux predicted Crosby would break most, if not all, of his Penguins scoring records.
Injuries — notably an ankle sprain in 2008, a concussion from 2011-12 and the broken jaw last year — have prevented Crosby from racking up individual honors. He has won only one scoring title and one MVP.
He also has his name on the Cup only once.
Crosby is asking a lot of himself this season. He wants everything.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.