ShareThis Page

Penguins Insider: Depth might be better fit for Stanley Cup playoffs

| Monday, April 14, 2014, 9:51 p.m.
The Penguins' Harry Zolnierczyk tries to deflect the puck next to the Blackhawks' Mike Kostka in the first period Monday, Sept. 23, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Harry Zolnierczyk tries to deflect the puck next to the Blackhawks' Mike Kostka in the first period Monday, Sept. 23, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

Coach Dan Bylsma ended the regular season Sunday night the way he started training camp in mid-September. He talked about wanting a third line that could score.

The Penguins never really found one during the 82-game tune-up for the Stanley Cup playoffs. The search continues as Bylsma tries to figure out the components that will make up his bottom-six forwards to start an opening-round playoff series against Columbus.

Wingers Harry Zolnierczyk and Chuck Kobasew were recalled for weekend games against Philadelphia and Ottawa. Each was informed by Penguins coaches that playoff lineup spots could be won.

For Zolnierczyk, that meant bringing speed and grit. He finished with three shots and two hits over the two games.

Kobasew, whom Bylsma said rediscovered his scoring touch with 10 goals in 12 games to wrap an AHL assignment, impressed in his one game Sunday. He attempted five shots — three were on net — and was credited with three hits and two blocks.

Neither, either or both could play against Columbus in Game 1 on Wednesday night at Consol Energy Center, Bylsma hinted.

“We've talked about what our lineup might look like given different opponents,” Bylsma said. “We know with the Columbus team we may be looking to have a more rounded third and fourth lines — that speed and maybe having the ability to score a little bit with our third and fourth lines, that maybe it's a factor.

“We'll see.”

Four players are set for bottom-six duty. Brandon Sutter will center a third line that likely will include winger Lee Stempniak. Tanner Glass, another winger, could join them. If not, he will play with forward Craig Adams on the fourth line.

That leaves two spots open, and more players than Kobasew and Zolnierczyk in the mix.

Wingers Brian Gibbons and Jayson Megna appeared in more than 35 games each and contributed five goals apiece. Both bring speed, which could serve the Penguins well facing a Blue Jackets squad with a similar system that calls for quick puck movement.

Center Joe Vitale, who also can play on the wing, said he expects to be available after missing the final 13 regular-season games because of an abdominal injury. Vitale is not a scorer — one goal in 53 games — but he is the Penguins' second best center on faceoffs, and success in that category should improve the possession battle they mostly lost in the second half.

Also, Bylsma could use defenseman Deryk Engelland on the fourth line. Engelland scored five of his six goals while playing up front. Engelland is a hard-edged player who can grind — elements that could complement well with Adams, especially on the cycle.

Ideal depth among bottom-six forwards is less about players' reputations than their abilities to handle specific roles.

Last postseason, the Penguins were so deep at forward that Jarome Iginla could only crack the top six by playing opposite his natural right wing, and winger Tyler Kennedy — a former 20-goal scorer — spent the opening four playoff games as a healthy scratch. When he did play, it was on a fourth line better suited for a checker.

The Penguins made the Eastern Conference final last postseason and were swept by Boston, and their bottom-six forwards combined for eight goals in 15 games. That squad seemingly was deep, but players were miscast in their roles.

If healthy, that should not be a problem for these Penguins.

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.