Pens insider: Penalty killing a concern in Stanley Cup playoffs
The Penguins have a problem.
They are heavily reliant on their special teams — they're statistically average, hardly Stanley Cup-caliber, in five-on-five play this season — but are being betrayed by a historical strength.
Something happened to the Penguins' penalty killing during the Olympic break, and it hasn't been fixed.
Before the break, the Penguins were killing 86.7 percent of their penalties, an outstanding number. Since returning Feb. 27, they have killed only 80.2 percent of their penalties.
The Penguins have allowed a power-play goal in 12 of their past 20 games.
“It is definitely a concern,” right wing Craig Adams said.
Of the 16 teams to qualify for the postseason, the Penguins rank 12th in even-strength scoring differential, making special teams' domination a necessity this spring.
Adams, one of the Penguins' top penalty killers, said players and the coaching staff are “trying to identify” the recent problems.
The loss of right wing Pascal Dupuis was a damaging blow to the penalty-killing unit. With Dupuis in the lineup, the Penguins killed 87.5 percent of their penalties, which was on pace to give the Penguins their second-best penalty-killing season in franchise history.
Without Dupuis, who sustained a season-ending knee injury Dec. 23, the Penguins have killed just 82.5 percent of their penalties.
The penalty-killing unit has deteriorated since the Olympics.
“We were very good up until then,” Adams said.
Adams said he believes the Penguins' penchant for turning the puck over is the primary reason for the decline in penalty kill percentage.
Defenseman Brooks Orpik's turnover led to Columbus center Mark Letestu's power-play goal in Game 1 of the first-round series Wednesday.
“We aren't getting clears when we have the chance,” Adams said. “There will always be times when it's a 50/50 situation and you get the puck out. But there have been times when we have clear control and we're still not getting it out. That's a problem.”
It's a problem that needs solved quickly.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.