Penguins' Bylsma and Blue Jackets' Richards know each other well
Penguins coach Dan Bylsma and Blue Jackets coach Todd Richards possess an extra 24 hours to find an edge.
The additional day probably won't be enough.
Bylsma and Richards are so familiar with one another that uncovering any mysteries or vulnerabilities in their respective systems seems unlikely before the Penguins host the Blue Jackets in Game 2 of their first-round series Saturday at Consol Energy Center.
“They are so similar system-wise,” said Blue Jackets center Mark Letestu, who played under Bylsma in Pittsburgh. “Adjusting to the practice drills in Columbus wasn't a problem.”
Bylsma and Richards always will be connected.
Richards was the head coach at Wilkes-Barre/Scranton when he hired Bylsma as his assistant.
The two had success together before Richards moved on to become an assistant for the San Jose Sharks. He later became coach of the Minnesota Wild and now the Blue Jackets.
Bylsma had instant success after replace Mike Therrien as Penguins coach in 2009, while Richards appears to be coming into his own as a coach in his second stint.
The respect the duo has for one another is abundantly clear.
“I learned a lot from Dan,” Richards said. “Dan is a very smart man and a smart hockey guy.”
The two coached together in Wilkes-Barre, which creates familiarity.
However, Richards said the time spent with Bylsma and Penguins assistant coach Tony Granato during the past year was particularly valuable.
Bylsma, who coached Team USA in the Winter Olympics in Sochi, decided to tab Richards and Granato as assistants.
Some of the conversations the coaches had during preparation for the Olympics remain fresh in Richards' mind.
“We were speaking freely in those meetings,” Richards said. “I probably learned a lot more from that than in our time together (in Wilkes-Barre). Talking systems, you're able to pick up on things. It's the same for him too.”
The Penguins made some well-documented changes to their system entering the season, implementing a more controlled approach to neutral zone play.
Richards, with a slight smile, explained he is well aware of the changes Bylsma and new Penguins assistant coach Jacques Martin made.
“He's (Bylsma) talked about doing different things in the neutral zone,” said Richards, who said he has read accounts of changes to the Penguins' system.
“I know exactly what he is talking about.”
Letestu insists the two are similar in almost every conceivable way.
“I know they know each other well, and I can tell you that they're both really good at in-game adjustments,” Letestu said. “It's kind of a friendly battle, I guess. They're both player's coaches. I think Dan is more animated at times. He's just a louder personality. Todd's pretty reserved. But they're both a treat to play for.”
Bylsma often speaks fondly of Richards and still remembers when he spoke with Richards for the first time regarding the opening for the assistant coach job in Wilkes-Barre.
“I was standing in the sun porch of my brother-in-law's house in Chicago for the interview,” Bylsma said. “I pace a lot when I talk on the phone, so I had to buy my brother-in-law a new carpet for his outdoor living space. I remember the interview quite vividly.”
Richards sounds like he remembers everything vividly that Bylsma says about hockey.
Bylsma, of course, knows his opponent just as well.
“I learned an awful lot,” Bylsma said of his time coaching with Richards.
The coaching showdown continues Saturday. It quite clearly remains a friendly showdown.
“It wasn't a fluke that we had success (together),” Richards said. “It was both of us working together. His personality and my personality, we worked well together.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.