Penguins' Bylsma wants Cup version of Letang
Coach Dan Bylsma wants Kris Letang to resurrect his form from five years ago.
“When I think about Kris at his best — and it's something we reference very often — it's his play in the '09 playoffs with Mark Eaton,” Bylsma said Friday after the Penguins practiced at Consol Energy Center.
“How he played, the role he played really, particularly, in the (Stanley Cup) Final. … He focused on playing defense, defending well, defense first.”
Then, Bylsma continued, Letang and Eaton were matched defensively against the Red Wings' third line, which featured winger Marian Hossa. Their assignment was to shut down Hossa.
The Penguins won the series, and Hossa finished only with three assists. The year before, while playing for the Penguins against Detroit in the Final, Hossa produced three goals and seven points.
The Penguins carry a 1-0 lead into a home Game 2 for their current best-of-seven series against Columbus on Saturday night.
Letang's playoff opener Wednesday night was not his finest of 81 playoff games. He misfired on three attempted shots and took minor penalties for slashing and interference. He played only 18 minutes and 20 seconds, and Bylsma acknowledged benching Letang for most of the final period.
Letang played only three minutes and 55 seconds on six third-period shifts.
A contrite Letang said Friday he deserved that cutting of his ice time, which was down about six minutes from the regular season.
“I put my team in trouble, and I have to remain in check and make sure these mistakes don't repeat themselves,” Letang said, referring to the retaliatory slashing penalty from the second period that Bylsma cited after Game 1.
Letang said Bylsma's handling of him in the third period was “the right thing to do.” He added that “there was nothing to say, really” during a Friday morning conversation with Bylsma.
“There's sanctions,” Letang said. “I mean, I have to respect my teammates. Taking a penalty like that was a lack of respect.”
For Letang, Game 1 marked only his fourth game since missing 10 weeks because of a stroke.
He is still working off rust and getting acclimated to game-type situations.
His slashing penalty was a response to Columbus forward Boone Jenner, a reputable agitator who was suspended in consecutive World Junior Championship tournaments. Letang also interfered with Columbus defenseman James Wisniewski while in the offensive zone with the Penguins on a power play and seeking to extend a one-goal lead.
In addition to better “keeping (his) cool,” Letang said he must improve on timing after the lengthy layoff because of the stroke. The foundation of his game — strong, smooth skating — is back, Letang said.
That skating is what proved so problematic for Hossa five years ago. Letang consistently closed off open space for Hossa, who was limited to three or fewer shots in five of seven games.
Letang finished the 2009 playoffs with four goals and 13 points, but that offensive production was secondary to his strong own-zone work, teammates said.
His partner, Eaton, was a stay-at-home defenseman. General manager Ray Shero signed a similar player, Rob Scuderi, last summer —specifically to pair with Letang, who sometimes becomes too infatuated with chasing scoring opportunities, in Shero and Bylsma's estimation.
“We've heard Brooks Orpik say that when Kris is playing well, it's that he defends first,” Bylsma said. “That's really when he's at his best. That's really what I go back to — his mentality in that series and how he played against Hossa.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.