Switch in pairings helps Penguins defensemen find groove in Game 3
COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Penguins' stars haven't made their mark in a first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against Columbus.
Their blue line, however, is alive and well.
A change in pairings triggered strong play from Penguins defensemen Monday, and the coaching staff hopes the two-way performance is a precursor of things to come.
“The first couple of games were hard for us,” assistant coach Todd Reirden said. “It was very difficult for the guys to adjust to the playoff atmosphere in those first two games. The intensity level and the battle level wasn't where it needed to be. But that push we saw in Game 3, that was a good thing.”
The Penguins made a change in the second period.
Rob Scuderi skated for a lengthy sequence with Matt Niskanen. The two were effective together in October.
Kris Letang, meanwhile, saw the majority of his shifts with rookie Olli Maatta.
The experiment worked.
“That's why you have a system,” Scuderi said.
“So everyone can be interchangeable.”
The decision to change pairings was rooted in a desire to create more offense.
Defenseman Brooks Orpik scored a goal shortly after the change, and defensemen Paul Martin and Maatta set up third-period goals. Receiving offense from the blue line has been a necessity because forwards Sidney Crosby, Evgeni Malkin, James Neal and Chris Kunitz are without a goal in the series.
“Sometimes, when you're having trouble generating offense,” Reirden said, “it's not forward lines that need changed. We went away from the original pairs for a while.
“It was able to generate different looks. It keeps you fresh, keeps you on your toes.”
Reirden came away from Game 3 having drawn a number of conclusions.
He wants Orpik and Martin, the one tandem that never will be split, on the ice as often as possible. They each played close to 10 minutes in the third period of Game 3. Reirden and coach Dan Bylsma praised how both played and were particularly delighted with Martin's performance.
“Just outstanding,” Reirden said. “Those two were absolutely outstanding. We leaned on them so heavily at the end of the game. I really couldn't get them out there enough.
“Both were really good, and the way Paulie played ... wow.”
Reirden also suggested Scuderi and Niskanen could see more time together. The two played together in October when Letang was out with a knee injury.
“It's definitely something we'll consider more,” Reirden said. “I like how Nisky and Scuds have played together.”
Reirden made one last item clear: He still believes in his prized rookie. Maatta was on the ice for all three goals against in Game 3.
He'll be on the ice in Game 4, too.
“(Monday) kind of sums up how it is with Olli,” Reirden said. “He was on the ice for three goals against. But I still had the belief in him to put him back out there. It wasn't all his fault.
“And he doesn't get down on himself. I always want to make sure to get him back out there.”
Maatta said Tuesday that the Blue Jackets' forwards have been difficult to handle because of their physicality. The rookie plans to handle it better in Game 4.
“It's a lot like the Olympics,” he said. “They're coming after us. But that's OK. That's just part of playoff hockey.”
Another part of playoff hockey is receiving strong work from the defensive group. That was the case in Game 3 as the Blue Jackets saw their scoring opportunities decrease as the game elapsed while the Penguins' offense surged.
“I wouldn't say we've been great,” Scuderi said. “The first two games, we had struggles. (Monday) was excellent.”
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.