ShareThis Page

Yohe: Penguins struggling in overtime

| Saturday, May 3, 2014, 9:00 p.m.
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby hangs his head after the Rangers scored in overtime of Game 1 of the second-round Stanley Cup playoff series Friday, May 2, 2014, at Consol Energy Center.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Sidney Crosby hangs his head after the Rangers scored in overtime of Game 1 of the second-round Stanley Cup playoff series Friday, May 2, 2014, at Consol Energy Center.

The Penguins don't particularly like working overtime.

They might want to figure it out sooner rather than later.

Excelling in overtime games is often a necessity during the Stanley Cup playoffs, as the difference between moving on in the tournament and hitting the golf course early can often be an overtime goal.

The Penguins have lost all three of their overtime appearances this postseason, and their performances in extra time haven't impressed coach Dan Bylsma.

“We haven't been good in them this year, I know that,” Bylsma said. “It's been in relatively short order.”

The Penguins lost to the New York Rangers in Game 1 of the second-round series just 3:06 into the first overtime period. They also fell early in Game 4 of the first round against Columbus, as Nick Foligno's goal ended the contest 2:49 into overtime.

Bylsma believes the Penguins have been far too passive in overtime. He'd prefer his team pounce on the opposition and go for the kill early.

Instead, they have been the hunted.

“I think sometimes you get into overtime looking to settle into a long OT,” Bylsma said. “I think we haven't come to win them. We haven't gone out to win them, with that shot mentality. We've seen that in all three games.”

Winning in overtime once wasn't such a problem for the Penguins.

In fact, the Penguins won their first five playoff overtime games of the Sidney Crosby era. Magical moments, like Marian Hossa ending a series against the Rangers in 2008, Petr Sykora extending the 2008 Stanley Cup Final, and a couple of goals during the 2009 Stanley Cup run — Bill Guerin's Game 2 winner against the Flyers and Kris Letang's Game 3 series-saver against the Capitals — are etched in the memories of fans and the Penguins themselves.

However, since winning five consecutive overtime games in the playoffs, the Penguins have gone 4-8 during the past five springs.

They've never won an overtime game at Consol Energy Center, going 0-4. Three of those four overtime setbacks at the Pens' new home occurred during the first 3:06 of the extra period.

Dating to last season, the Penguins have lost five consecutive overtime games.

Captain Sidney Crosby, in the biggest scoring funk of his career, has never won a postseason game in overtime despite participating in 16 of them. The Penguins' record in his 16 overtime appearances is 8-8.

That figure once was much better.

Owner Mario Lemieux also never won a Stanley Cup playoff game in overtime, though the Penguins did go 7-5 in his 12 postseason overtime appearances.

Regardless of who scores the goal, the Penguins would like to be successful in their next overtime game. It's been a while.

They haven't won an overtime playoff game at home in five years, and they know that must change.

“I think it's tough to go back a number of years and see what the mindset was in each of the games and years,” Bylsma said.

It's not tough to see that overtime has been a problem for the Penguins.

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.