Rangers coach challenges top line to match efforts of Penguins stars
NEW YORK — Alain Vigneault challenged, then changed his team.
The result, though, was not what the New York Rangers' coach hoped for.
Prior to Monday night's 2-0 loss to the Penguins in Game 3 of the second round of the Stanley Cup playoffs, Vigneault called out his top line of Rick Nash, Derek Stepan and Martin St. Louis.
“Their big boys put on the big boys pants,” Vigneault said of the Penguins' stars performance in Game 2 Sunday night. “I need (my stars) to do that.”
When general manager Glen Sather hired Vigneault to replace John Tortorella as coach last June, it partly was due to the Rangers having tired of the tone in which Tortorella's unrelenting message was delivered.
In calling out his top line in the manner he did, Vigneault channeled Tortorella.
The Rangers' top line — the trio of Nash, Stepan and St. Louis — has 14 points (four goals and 10 assists) in New York's first 10 playoff games. However, the line has accumulated only two points — both assists — dating to Game 5 of the first-round series against the Philadelphia Flyers.
Nash has four assists, all coming in the first three games against the Flyers. Stepan and St. Louis have not recorded a point in their last five games.
Not content to solely express his discontent, Vigneault overhauled his lineup as he sat left wing Daniel Carcillo, right wing Derek Dorsett and defenseman John Moore for J.T. Miller, Jesper Fast and Raphael Diaz. Vigneault also reconstructed his lines and started the game with Nash on a line with Brad Richards and Carl Hagelin, while Stepan centered Miller and St. Louis.
“I'm not going to get into all the reasoning why,” Vigneault said of the changes. “(It's) probably easy to say the schedule and fresh legs.”
The new lines lasted all of two periods. Before the end of the second and with the Rangers trailing 2-0, Vigneault put Nash and St. Louis back with Stepan.
Vigneault suggested his top players “picked up” his challenge of matching the Penguins' stars production. The scoresheet showed Nash finished with eight shot attempts, and Stepan and St. Louis had four and three, respectively.
“Our whole team, I thought, (played) a strong game,” Vigneault said when asked to asses the Nash-Stepan-St. Louis line. “We didn't give them much in the way of opportunities, and we had some real good looks. Just couldn't score.”
And now, after the Rangers were shut out for the second game in a row, their season is two losses away from ending.
Denis Gorman is a freelance writer.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.