Share This Page

True to form, Rangers' early lead proves enough

| Tuesday, May 13, 2014, 11:03 p.m.

In a series in which the team that scored first won every game, the first goal of Game 7 characteristically meant everything.

It was the New York Rangers who scored it — and it was the Rangers who moved on to the Eastern Conference final.

The Penguins played a solid first period Tuesday, but New York took advantage of a rare breakdown. Brian Boyle's goal 5 12 minutes into the game gave the Rangers the lead. They never trailed and won 2-1 in the deciding game of the second-round series.

“When we get the lead, we can sit back a little bit and wait for their mistakes and then go,” Rangers goalie Henrik Lundqvist said. “And we did a really good job of that.”

Boyle finished a pretty transition passing sequence with fellow forwards Derek Dorsett and Dominic Moore, beating goalie Marc-Andre Fleury with a shot between Fleury's legs while alone just above the top of the crease.

The play began on a poor keep-in at the right point by Penguins defenseman Matt Niskanen that led to an odd-man rush. Niskanen then took himself out of the play on an attempted hit at the blue line.

“I fanned at the blue line. They got a 4-on-2 out of it,” said Niskanen, whose penalty also led to the Rangers' other goal. “So we're down 1-0.”

Just like Games 5 and 6. But unlike Friday and Sunday, the Penguins didn't wilt. They allowed the second goal during each of those two games and ended up losing both in rather listless fashion.

Still, the damage was done as Lundqvist was at the top of his game. Jussi Jokinen beat him 4 minutes, 15 seconds into the second period when he was shoved to the ice and the puck came to him while wide open low in the right-wing circle.

But that would be one of only three goals Lundqvist allowed over the final 185:56 of the series.

Brad Richards' power-play goal 3:41 later proved to be the winner.

The Penguins were generating chances but could not beat Lundqvist, a four-time Vezina Trophy finalist.

“It's not easy,” said Penguins defenseman Rob Scuderi of allowing the first goal. “You're playing from behind against a sound defensive hockey team with a great goaltender. You're putting yourself in a hole.”

Just like the Penguins had during almost all of Games 5 and 6. Over the final three games, the Penguins did not hold a lead. The Rangers led for 157:44; the score was tied for only 22:16.

That's how the Rangers are built to play. And it all begins with that first goal.

Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.