Share This Page

Penguins coaching staff faces uncertain future

| Friday, May 16, 2014, 8:12 p.m.

The Penguins coaching staff remains. For now.

Coach Dan Bylsma and assistants Tony Granato, Todd Reirden, Jacques Martin and Mike Bales have been retained, but all are in a peculiar position.

Penguins CEO David Morehouse announced Friday that general manager Ray Shero had been fired. However, Morehouse avoided using Bylsma's name in his opening address and, when pushed, explained that the coaching staff remains intact. He said the next GM will have the authority to dismiss Bylsma and his staff.

Morehouse dismissed talk of an “element of weirdness” about the situation.

“We're trying to do it systematically, and what we wanted to do was first address the situation at the top,” Morehouse said.

Carolina, Washington, Nashville and Vancouver have coaching vacancies, and Bylsma would figure to vault into contention for any of them. Granato's name also has been mentioned in Washington. But if the Penguins' uncertainty persists, those jobs may be filled before Bylsma and his assistants can apply.

None opted to comment Friday. Numerous players also declined to discuss the situation.

Bylsma is under contract for two more seasons.

“Another team is not allowed to (contact him),” Morehouse said. “But I have complete confidence that if Dan is indeed not the coach here that he'll quickly be picked up somewhere else.”

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jyohe@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.