Rutherford's hire as Pens GM brings out Internet's best, worst
Leave it to the hiring of a 65-year-old man to turn the Internet upside down.
The Penguins' announcement Friday that Jim Rutherford will succeed Ray Shero as general manager set off a fire storm of calamity on Twitter and Wikipedia.
For a brief time, Rutherford's middle name, according to his Wikipedia page, was listed as “Gregory Polanco,” a not-so-subtle nod to the Pirates' right fielder of the future.
The Ontario native's middle name, of course, is not Gregory Polanco, and the page eventually was changed.
Penguins fan Phil Jay (@PhilJayAyeEn) had one of the funniest tweets, referencing the number of two-part questions thrown at Rutherford during a news conference that lasted more than 27 minutes.
Rutherford neglected several times to answer both halves, though that hardly puts him in unique company among coaches.
“Pens got a senior citizen discount on this guy,” Jay tweeted. “He can't even respond to two part questions. #FIRERUTHERFORD.”
Phil Lee, a Pittsburgh fan from Worksop, England, chimed in with another joke.
“Well, Jim is almost as bald as Pierre.” Lee wrote on Twitter, referencing NBC analyst and fellow GM candidate Pierre McGuire.
Lee later turned compassionate with regard to former coach Dan Bylsma.
“Thanks for the memories, Dan, sincerely,” Lee tweeted.
Josh Bagiackas (@geministorm21) praised the moves and later offered a suggestion for Rutherford's first hire.
“I hope rutherford hires @RealRocket22 (former Penguin Rick Tocchet) as the next head coach,” Bagiackas tweeted.
It didn't take long for Rutherford to take to social media. By mid-afternoon, his Twitter account (@PenguinsGMJR) reflected his new job, and he tweeted a picture of a small boy holding a Penguin.
Above it read, “My family & I are thrilled to be a part of the @penguins. It's a great city w/awesome fans — appreciate the support!”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.