Penguins GM Rutherford says he has listened to trade ideas
NHL teams are after Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford's new players.
“Some people came after me today, and there's ideas out there,” Rutherford told reporters in New York, where general managers held their annual Stanley Cup Final meeting Wednesday. “I haven't been throwing any ideas out, but I'll listen.”
The Penguins have about $55 million in salary-cap space committed to 14 players for next season. The NHL projects the cap to be set at around $68 million.
Eight Penguins players will have full or modified trade clauses that kick in July 1, with a notable exception being winger James Neal.
In the three weeks the Penguins went without a general manager, Neal's agent received calls from several clubs that expressed interest in acquiring his client, who told the Tribune-Review he has not requested a trade.
The Penguins have 11 players set to become unrestricted free agents July 1. One is defenseman Matt Niskanen. Rutherford said retaining him “is not going to be easy.”
Rutherford, who will begin interviewing coaching candidates next week, also said he has not met with captain Sidney Crosby.
“Maybe at some point,” Rutherford said. “I've been calling trying to say hello to players, and half of them are wrong numbers or they're off on vacation somewhere. I'm trying to get as much done as I can in a short period of time.”
Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.