Share This Page

Penguins 2nd-day picks

| Saturday, June 28, 2014, 9:10 p.m.

Penguins 2nd-day picks

Sam Lafferty

Round drafted: Fourth

Position: Right winger

Hometown: Hollidaysburg

Height/weight: 6-0/175 pounds

Shoots: Right

Age: 19

2013-14 stats: 21 goals, 34 assists, 55 points in 25 games at Deerfield Academy

(Massachusetts)

Pre-Draft rankings: Not ranked by International Scouting Service; not ranked by Red Line Report

Anthony Angello

Round drafted: Fifth

Position: Center

Hometown: Albany, N.Y.

Height/weight: 6- 4190

Shoots: Right

Age: 18

2013-14 stats: 11 goals, 10 assists, 21 points in 58 games at Omaha (USHL)

Pre-Draft rankings: Not ranked by International Scouting Service; ranked No. 281 by Red Line Report

Jaden Lindo

Round drafted: Sixth

Position: Right wing

Hometown: Brampton, Ontario

Height/weight: 6- 1194

Shoots: Right

Age: 18

2013-14 stats: Nine goals and nine assists in 40 games at Owen Sound (OHL)

Pre-Draft rankings: Ranked No. 116 by Intentional Scouting Service; ranked No. 222 by Red Line Report

Jeff Taylor

Round drafted: Seventh

Position: Defenseman

Hometown: Albany, N.Y.

Height/weight: 6-0/180

Shoots: Left

Age: 18

2013-14 stats: Three goals and 13 assists in 41 games at Union College (NCAA)

Pre-Draft rankings: Not ranked by International Scouting Service; not ranked by Red Line Report

— Josh Yohe

Related Content
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.