Defenseman Christian Ehrhoff knows all about playoff disappointments, having spent most of his career with Vancouver and San Jose.
He wants to win a Stanley Cup and said he believes the Penguins provide him with the best opportunity.
That's why he said he signed a one-year, $4 million deal with the Penguins even though other teams were prepared to offer him multiyear contracts.
“I thought Pittsburgh was the best fit for me,” said Ehrhoff, who played in Vancouver's Game 7 loss in the 2011 Stanley Cup Final against Boston. Ehrhoff said he isn't necessarily interested in playing elsewhere after his deal expires.
“I keep the option to re-sign when it hopefully works out well,” he said. “We'll see what happens.”
Ehrhoff, 31, recently had his contract bought out by the Buffalo Sabres.
“I was really, really surprised by the news,” said Ehrhoff, who expected to be traded following three disappointing campaigns in Buffalo.
The Sabres are in a rebuilding phase.
Ehrhoff said the buyout doesn't provide extra motivation. Winning a championship is what drives him.
“The Penguins have a great lineup,” said Ehrhoff, who believes his offensive-minded style will mesh nicely with Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin. “Pittsburgh is one of the teams always mentioned when you talk about teams that can win the Cup. That's why I signed here.”
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.