Recchi rejoins Pens, this time as a coach
The Penguins brought back another Stanley Cup winner from their early 1990s heyday.
Mark Recchi was hired as player development coach, the team announced Friday. Recchi, who had 385 points in 389 games over three stints with the Penguins, fills a position that was vacated when Bill Guerin was promoted to assistant general manager last month.
Recchi will be responsible for working with and assisting in the development of prospects and players throughout the Penguins' organization in the minor leagues as well as in junior and college hockey.
A three-time Stanley Cup winner — including in 1991 as now-owner Mario Lemieux's right wing — Recchi ranks fourth all time in NHL games played (1,652), 12th in points (1,533) and 19th in goals (577).
Recchi was part of a five-player trade in early 1992 with the Philadelphia Flyers that netted the Penguins, among others, Rick Tocchet. Tocchet won the '92 Cup with the Penguins and was hired as an assistant coach for the team last month.
Recchi, 46, retired after winning the Stanley Cup in 2011 with the Boston Bruins. He has been living in Pittsburgh and has spent the past two years with the Pittsburgh Penguins Elite youth hockey program. During that period, he was also a senior advisor for the Dallas Stars.
Chris Adamski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.