ShareThis Page

No bitterness from Daley, Scuderi in first meeting since trade

| Tuesday, Jan. 5, 2016, 10:54 p.m.

Almost a month after joining the Penguins via a trade that sent Rob Scuderi to Chicago, Trevor Daley still isn't sure why his tenure with the Blackhawks, which consisted of 29 games, ended so quickly and included few highlights.

He hinted at a lack of ice time the day the deal happened, Dec. 14, but he eased back from that stance after a light morning skate at Consol Energy Center, hours before he played against the Blackhawks for the first time since his departure.

“I wish I had bad things to say about that team, but I don't,” Daley said. “I enjoyed my time there, and I learned a lot. I went in there with an open mind to figure out what these guys have been doing right all these years. I think I took a lot out of it for the short time I was there.”

Residual bitterness toward their former teams, certainly a possibility for the defensemen given the nature of the late-night trade in which they were exchanged, failed to materialize as they prepared to square off against players they called teammates just a few weeks ago. Daley is a prominent contributor with the Penguins, who have entrusted him with more ice time, including power-play opportunities, and encouraged him to embrace his offense-creating tendencies.

Scuderi, accepting of the fact he gets less ice time with Chicago, appreciates that his new team asks nothing more or different of him than what the Penguins expected.

“I'm not going to become something else overnight,” Scuderi said. “I'm still doing roughly the same role.”

The announcement of the trade Dec. 14, during the Penguins' loss to Washington in coach Mike Sullivan's debut, inspired intrigue and slight shock among fans. Daley, who had career highs in goals (16) and assists (22) in 2014-15 with Dallas, gave the Penguins a puck-moving defenseman general manager Jim Rutherford suggested the team needed just days earlier.

Scuderi passed on pondering the reasons the Penguins, who drafted him in 1998, again parted ways with him.

“It's like they say: Don't think, you'll only hurt the team,” Scuderi said. “It's just something that happens in the business, and you learn to move on.”

Daley embraced his new team and boosted the quality of players around him. The possession and pace-of-play metrics for Olli Maatta, Daley's most frequent partner on the blue line, are better than what Maatta had in 139 minutes of five-on-five ice time with Scuderi, according to

Blackhawks defenseman Michal Roszival, who usually paired with Daley and now often skates beside Scuderi, made no effort to deny the differences between his current and former blue line partner.

“They're totally different players,” Roszival said. “I feel like playing with Trevor, I think I needed to be a little more defensive, just in the back of my mind, making sure there's always somebody back there. He's so fast, that even if I jumped into a play, he'd always outskate me up the ice. But yeah, it's a bit of adjustment, for sure.”

Roszival's possession metrics predictably dipped when he began pairing with Scuderi. But Penguins defenseman Ben Lovejoy said advanced metrics insufficiently define Scuderi's value.

“He's a great player who I don't think gets the credit he deserves,” Lovejoy said. “He was a guy people gravitated towards. You wanted to have dinner with Rob. You wanted to be sitting next to him on the plane. You wanted to hang out with him in the locker room.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.