ShareThis Page

Lemieux, Burkle refute claim of rift, say Penguins still up for sale

| Thursday, Jan. 14, 2016, 1:45 p.m.
Penguins owners Mario Lemieux and Ron Burkle ride past fans along the Boulevard of the Allies in downtown Pittsburgh on June 15, 2009, during the team's Stanley Cup victory parade.

Exploration of a potential Penguins sale continues for co-owners Ron Burkle and Mario Lemieux, who issued a joint statement Thursday to refute a report of a sale-crippling rift between them.

“There is no disagreement between us, and we remain completely aligned in both approach and philosophy,” they said in the statement released by the team. “We continue to explore all of our strategic options, including a possible sale.

“There is not, and has never been, an established price for the team, and we are still in conversations with potential buyers.”

Their statement deviated from their plan, one followed for months, to not publicly address the potential sale until the completion of the exploratory process, which began in June when they announced the hiring of financial firm Morgan Stanley.

According to a New York Post report, disagreement emerged between Burkle and Lemieux over a potential sale price, and complications led the men to take the Penguins off the market. The report cited only anonymous sources.

Through a spokesperson, the NHL declined to comment on the report or its assertions, which included a suggestion that the league does not want any team's sale to fall below $700 million, lest the sale jeopardize the $500 million fee for expansion teams.

The spokesperson said unless a team requests assistance with a sale, the league's involvement with the process does not begin until the Board of Governors meets to approve a team's new owner.

The initial price tag for the Penguins was $750 million, which, if agreed upon with a buyer, would set a record for a U.S.-based NHL team.

Purchased for $107 million in 1999, the Penguins were valuated at $560 million by Forbes in November.

Forbes appraised the organization at $565 million in 2014.

Much of the debate about the Penguins' value centers on the worth of the development rights the organization holds to the 28-acre property where the Civic Arena once stood and whether those rights can be included in the sale.

The city granted the team's ownership exclusive development rights to that site in 2007 to keep the Penguins from relocating.

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.