Share This Page

Penguins notebook: Pouliot recalled, then scratched

| Monday, Jan. 18, 2016, 10:30 a.m.
NHLI via Getty Images
The Penguins' Derrick Pouliot skates against the Ottawa Senators on April 7, 2015, at Canadian Tire Centre in Ottawa, Ontario.

ST. LOUIS — In the small picture, there's nothing particularly striking about Derrick Pouliot's call-up from Wilkes-Barre/Scranton on Monday.

Kris Letang was day to day after suffering an apparent upper-body injury Friday in Tampa. David Warsofsky was out with a concussion suffered Sunday against Carolina.

Letang and Warsofsky are offensive-minded defensemen who can play on the power play, and the Baby Pens player who best fit that description was Pouliot. Add in the fact that Pouliot is on an AHL hot streak, recording a goal, five assists and a plus-8 rating in eight January games, and the decision wasn't a difficult one.

Pouliot got the call, took warm-ups, then was scratched when Letang was OK to play.

“Everything was fine up here for these guys, and we just got back off our road trip, and all of a sudden, I'm here the next day,” Pouliot said. “Things happen quick.”

The more interesting question, of course, is what happens next.

Pouliot could be a short-term injury replacement destined to quickly return to the minors. He also could establish himself as an NHL player and give the Penguins defense corps, maligned at times, a significant boost of creativity and mobility.

Coach Mike Sullivan didn't rule out that possibility.

“We're trying to create an environment here where performance is the dictator, and I'm a strong believer in healthy competition from within,” Sullivan said. “I think it drives players to be at their best. I think a guy like Derrick that's knocking on the door, that's pushing for a roster spot, is good for all our guys that are here.”

For that to happen, Pouliot will have to shed the problems with decision making and defensive-zone play that plagued him in training camp.

“I'm paying attention to my own zone,” Pouliot said. “The offense is there on the power play when I get opportunities to try to create it. I'm trying to play more of a complete game, lots of skating, being hard on guys and really paying attention to my own end.”

Bad fall

Warsofsky suffered one of the season's more unusual injuries Sunday when he landed violently after skating backwards into sliding referee Tim Peel, who had fallen down seconds earlier.

“It was really bizarre,” Sullivan said. “It was really unfortunate. Timmy Peel just lost an edge. As a defenseman, when you're backing up defending the rush, you don't expect that. It was scary because he wasn't able to break his fall in any way because it surprised him the way it did. But he's OK. I think he's going to be fine in time.”

Making progress

The Penguins didn't have an official morning skate Monday, but injured winger Beau Bennett skated with a few teammates under the watchful eye of team staff.

Sullivan said Bennett, who has been out since Washington's T.J. Oshie drove him into the boards Dec. 14, is close to returning to practice.

“I think it's going to be soon,” Sullivan said. “He had a real good practice today. (Assistant coach Rick Tocchet) put him through a pretty good workout. He responded well to it. We'll see how he responds overnight, and we'll go from there.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jbombulie@tribweb.com or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.