ShareThis Page

Dumoulin's simple style fits with Daley on Penguins' defense

| Thursday, Feb. 4, 2016, 9:03 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Brian Dumoulin is second among Penguins defensemen in even-strength minutes, assists and plus-minus rating.

A Maine native who embraced defense at an early age and continued his hockey career at Boston College, Brian Dumoulin found the love and admiration for legendary Boston Bruins defenseman Ray Bourque almost inescapable prior to the start of his professional career.

Dumoulin certainly appreciated the style and success of Bourque, a perennial contender for the Norris Trophy as one of the league's top all-around defenseman, but his heart pulled him in a different direction.

“It's funny — I actually liked Joe Sakic growing up, who was a goal-scoring forward,” Dumoulin said. “Kind of the complete opposite of me.”

More than halfway through his first full NHL season, Dumoulin fits the description of shut-down defenseman as well as anyone on the Penguins' roster. He usually jumps over the boards when opponents send their first or second line on the ice. And after spending the entire first half of the season beside Ben Lovejoy as part of the Penguins' no-frills defensive pair, he's determining how to mesh with a more aggressive partner in Trevor Daley.

“He keeps it simple when he has to, but he's very creative and joins the rush, so it's been fun playing with him,” Dumoulin said of Daley. “I try to play the same way I did with Ben. … I'd say (my style) is simple. I make the play when it's there. If it's not, just keep the puck moving. Keep it going north.”

Coach Mike Sullivan broke up the Dumoulin-Lovejoy pairing Jan. 23. He continued to put Dumoulin with Daley and Ben Lovejoy with Derrick Pouliot in the two games that followed. His explanation for the changes were cryptic, as he insisted defensive pairings become fluid concepts over the course of a game.

“I think the most important thing is that we put our defensemen in a position where they can play to their strengths and be successful,” Sullivan said.

A sample size of three games only hints at how Dumoulin might operate with Daley, but the early returns spell trouble for opposing offenses.

With Dumoulin and Daley together on the ice, the Penguins have allowed 43.60 shot attempts per 60 minutes of five-on-five play and averaged 54.50 shot attempts, according to

When Dumoulin and Lovejoy skated together in five-on-five scenarios — more than 618 minutes — the Penguins averaged 49.26 shot attempts allowed per 60 minutes, and their shot attempt rate was 56.93.

“I think that both of us were out there to play defense first,” Lovejoy said. “I think that our goal was to nullify the other team, to not give up scoring chances, not give up goals. ... And I think we did a very good job of that.”

Partnered with Pouliot, Lovejoy's possession numbers remain favorable.

“I've played with a number of very high-end, skilled young defensemen throughout my career,” Lovejoy said, “and my job is to help them feel comfortable. If I can make Derrick's job easier, make that transition easier, it's going to be good for the entire team. You can really see him coming along.”

Dumoulin, meanwhile, refuses to stray from what worked in the season's first few months, even if skating alongside Daley presents new opportunities on offense. Few defensemen in the league limit opponents' scoring chances better than Dumoulin, according to, and the 24-year-old resists the urge to find out whether a little Ray Bourque-style skill is within him.

“Ever since he's here, I've always liked having him in front of me,” goalie Marc-Andre Fleury said. “He doesn't make many mistakes out there. He joins the offense. He doesn't get beat defensively.

“His consistency — at a young age, it's not easy. He's doing very good at it. … Every night, you know what you're getting.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.