ShareThis Page

Penguins, Flyers set to mix it up in games outdoors

| Friday, Feb. 5, 2016, 7:33 p.m.

TAMPA, Fla. — The Penguins and Philadelphia Flyers are set to play an outdoor game at Heinz Field next season, a source familiar with the NHL's plans said Friday.

Some details need to be ironed out, but the game is expected to be part of the league's Stadium Series later in the winter, rather than the Winter Classic on or around Jan. 1, because of potential schedule conflicts with the Steelers.

The Penguins will return the favor and play an outdoor game in Philadelphia in “a couple of years.”

Plans to have the Penguins and Flyers play a neutral-site game at Penn State's Beaver Stadium fell apart when the teams found the idea to be too cost prohibitive, the source said.

The game would be part of a celebration of the 50th anniversary of the NHL's 1967 expansion, which saw the Penguins and Flyers enter the league as part of a six-team class.

The Toronto Maple Leafs are expected to host the Winter Classic as part of a celebration of the club's 100th anniversary.

A Penguins spokesman declined comment.

Heinz Field would be the first venue to host a second outdoor game. The Penguins played the Washington Capitals in the Winter Classic on Jan. 1, 2011.

The Penguins were the visiting team in a pair of outdoor games: the Winter Classic against the Buffalo Sabres on Jan. 1, 2008, at Ralph Wilson Stadium, and a Stadium Series matchup against the Chicago Blackhawks on March 1, 2014, at Soldier Field.

Philadelphia hosted the Winter Classic in 2012, with the Flyers playing the New York Rangers at Citizens Bank Park.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.