Share This Page

Flyers complete weekend sweep of Penguins with another win at Consol

| Sunday, March 16, 2014, 3:00 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Evgeni Malkin fights for the puck with the Flyers' Steve Downie in the third period Sunday, March 16, 2014, at Consol Energy Center.

The Penguins explained that Sunday's loss to the Flyers was an execution problem and that Saturday's was an effort problem.

Maybe the Flyers are the problem.

Philadelphia ambushed the Penguins in the first period Sunday at Consol Energy Center and held on for a 4-3 victory that pushed the Flyers' record at the Penguins' new building to 10-2-1.

The Penguins maintain a 15-point lead in the Metropolitan Division, but they probably won't feel so relaxed if the Flyers are their opponent in the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs. Such a scenario remains possible.

“They're good,” right wing Craig Adams said. “And we need to find a way to be better against them.”

The Penguins played among their worst periods during Sunday's opening 20 minutes, a carryover from Saturday's shutout loss.

A similar formula paid off for the Flyers.

Forwards Scott Hartnell and Zac Rinaldo baited center Evgeni Malkin and defenseman Robert Bortuzzo into taking retaliatory penalties. Wayne Simmonds scored twice on the power play to help give Philadelphia an early 3-0 lead.

“They're just so talented,” Penguins forward Joe Vitale said. “But we'll figure it out.”

There was no shortage of troubling occurrences for the Penguins on Sunday:

• They allowed a short-handed goal for a second straight game.

• They were badly outplayed in front of Marc-Andre Fleury in the first period, which prompted coach Dan Bylsma to replace Fleury with backup goalie Jeff Zatkoff.

• Malkin and Sidney Crosby were held without a point for a second straight game.

• Crosby twice left the ice during power plays earlier than the others on the top unit, a rare occurrence for him.

“This is going to be a great experience for us,” Vitale said.

With high-profile-players — James Neal, Chris Kunitz, Pascal Dupuis, Kris Letang, Paul Martin and Beau Bennett — out of the lineup, adversity for the Penguins has arrived with a vengeance. Sunday's game had some players saying adversity before the postseason can be positive.

“Our last two Marches have been too easy,” defenseman Matt Niskanen said. “Yeah, we were winning, but we weren't playing our best. We were making a lot of mistakes. So if we handle this, it's going to be good for us. Something like we're going through right now makes you have to work. I don't know if you can say that about our last two Marches.”

The Penguins carried play in the final two periods, particularly in five-on-five situations. Crosby was denied by Flyers goalie Steve Mason on a rush with 30 seconds left and struck the post on a deflection with 1 second left.

Wilkes-Barre/Scranton callups Jayson Megna and Brian Gibbons helped the Penguins control play in the second and third periods.

“Today was better,” Niskanen said. “We weren't prepared on Saturday. That game got away from us. Today we had some mistakes, and it cost us. But we didn't fall part. We battled back. Losing stinks. But it was good that we didn't fall apart. To not blow up like we have in the past is a good thing.”

Another loss to their biggest rival, in fact, seemed to motivate the Penguins.

“We've missed guys throughout the year,” Crosby said. “And we always found a way.”

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jyohe@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.