ShareThis Page
Pirates manager Clint Hurdle calls pitch clock a ‘fair allotment of time’ | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates manager Clint Hurdle calls pitch clock a ‘fair allotment of time’

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:12 p.m
772072_web1_GTR-BucsNB01-082218
Pirates manager Clint Hurdle looks out from the dugout during a game against the Braves Tuesday, Aug. 21, 2018, at PNC Park.

BRADENTON, Fla. — Pirates manager Clint Hurdle expressed no objection to MLB unilaterally employing a pitch clock in spring training games, a move made to get players accustomed to a possible rule change for this season.

“I don’t feel it’s pushing any type of urgency on anybody to get anything done,” Hurdle said Tuesday at Pirate City. “I think that’s a fair allotment of time to get up on the mound and deliver a pitch.”

Hurdle said the Pirates will make a presentation to their pitchers about the proposed 20-second pitch clock, which the MLBPA has resisted as part of commissioner Rob Manfred’s efforts to improve pace of play by reducing mound visits, between-innings breaks and the number of times a batter steps outside the batter’s box.

“We’ve actually been working on an internal clock, but we like our pitchers to fire at 15 seconds or less, so we’ve been talking about this for a long time,” Hurdle. “If they’ve got time, they can do a little bit of thinking. You’re not in a rush. You’re not forcing anything to happen. We felt 15 seconds was a pretty good pause time in which to get a ball back, get yourself together, get back on the mound and start the motion to make another pitch. …

“With 20 seconds, you’ve actually got a little bit more time to work.”

Love baseball? Stay up-to-date with the latest Pittsburgh Pirates news.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin by email at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Sports | Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.