ShareThis Page

Pirates place Jung Ho Kang on restricted list

| Saturday, March 11, 2017, 1:45 p.m.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Pirates infielder Jung Ho Kang takes batting practice Sunday, March 1, 2015, at Pirate City in Bradenton, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates president Frank Coonelly watches a game against the Orioles Saturday, March 11, 2017, at Ed Smith Stadium in Sarasota, Fla.

Updated 2453 hours ago

SARASOTA, Fla. — Pirates president Frank Coonelly said the organization's decision to put Jung Ho Kang on the restricted list "is neither a statement of pessimism or optimism" that the third baseman will be ready to play by opening day.

"It's really a procedural matter to put him on the restricted list at this point," Coonelly said before the Pirates played the Orioles in spring training game Saturday afternoon. "He's beyond the point of the mandatory reporting date of spring training. It provides us with some flexibility."

Kang remains in his native South Korea while issues associated with acquiring a visa to get to the United States are resolved. The delay is a result of an 8-month suspended prison sentence given to Kang on March 3 for fleeing the scene of a DUI incident Dec. 2. The Seoul Central District Court suspended Kang's penalty for two years.

An industry source said Kang is "hopeful" issues with getting visa approval can be resolved next week. Coonelly would not indicate a timetable.

"It's become complicated as a result of the criminal matter," Coonelly said. "So (there's) no further update on that topic, and no firm date by which we know that he can travel to the United States. We're still working cooperatively with Jung Ho, his (agent) and his legal representatives, trying to secure the visa to travel into the States."

Opening day for the Pirates is April 3 in Boston. The Pirates are operating as if veteran David Freese is the starting third baseman in Kang's absence. Manager Clint Hurdle declined to offer a "drop-dead" date for Kang to report in order to be on the opening day roster.

"It's a hypothetical situation, so I just wait and be like everybody else and wait and see how this all plays itself out," Hurdle said. "We haven't seen the man. I know he's working hard. How hard he can work over there to prepare for a date that we don't even know is going to happen?

"I'm with the men we have here. We've got men here that we are working on and planning on walking into the season with. If something changes on his end, we will change as well."

The 29-year-old Kang, who frequently batted in the cleanup spot, had 21 home runs last season in just 370 plate appearances. Only Andrew McCutchen (24) and Gregory Polanco (22) had more home runs for the Pirates last season.

His DUI arrest was his third in Korea. Coonelly on Saturday reiterated his position expressed that the organization would withhold judgment on any discipline it might or might not levy on Kang.

"Still no conclusions," Coonelly said. "We still want to sit down and talk with Jung Ho, face-to-face, before making any determinations on discipline."

Placing a player on the restricted list is not, in itself, a punitive measure. Coonelly said those on the list during the regular season are not paid (no players collect salary during spring training).

Putting Kang on the restricted list could signal the Pirates are preparing to add a veteran player. It cleared a roster spot — players on the restricted list do not count on either the 25- or 40-man rosters — and the Pirates do not have a true fourth outfielder on their roster.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.