ShareThis Page

Scouting report for Sunday, June 18: Cubs at Pirates

Rob Biertempfel
| Saturday, June 17, 2017, 7:03 p.m.
Pirates pitcher Jameson Taillon makes his way to the dugout with catcher Elias Diaz before a game against the Rockies Monday, June 12, 2017, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitcher Jameson Taillon makes his way to the dugout with catcher Elias Diaz before a game against the Rockies Monday, June 12, 2017, at PNC Park.

Pirates gameday

vs. Cubs

1:35 p.m.

PNC Park

TV/radio: Root Sports/93.7 FM, 1480 AM, Pirates Radio Network

Probable pitchers

Pirates RHP Jameson Taillon (3-1, 2.90) vs. Cubs RHP John Lackey (4-7, 5.26)

Gamecast: In his last start, Lackey gave up four runs, all via homers, and took the loss vs. the Mets. Over his past five starts, he is 0-4 with a 6.75 ERA. … Lackey is allowing 2.27 home runs per nine innings, which is more than double his career rate (0.98 HR/9). He has served up 19 homers in 75 13 IP. Last year, Lackey allowed 23 home runs in 188 13 IP. … It's been 364 days since Cubs C Willson Contreras got his first at-bat in the majors and smacked a first-pitch homer off Pirates reliever A.J. Schugel at Wrigley Field. … Last Tuesday and Wednesday, Anthony Rizzo became the first Cub since at least 1920 to hit a leadoff homer in each of his first two games batting leadoff. … Taillon is 2-1 with a 2.65 ERA in three career starts vs. the Cubs.

Next up

Monday, 7:40 p.m.: Pirates RHP Gerrit Cole (4-6, 4.54) vs. Brewers RHP Matt Garza (3-2, 4.17)

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.