ShareThis Page
Pirates

Pirates among MLB's top earners at $35M in 2017, Forbes says

| Wednesday, April 11, 2018, 3:27 p.m.
Pirates chairman Bob Nutting takes in a spring training game on Feb. 24, 2018, at LECOM Park in Bradenton, Fla.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates chairman Bob Nutting takes in a spring training game on Feb. 24, 2018, at LECOM Park in Bradenton, Fla.

Small-market disadvantage? Not so fast, according to Forbes.

The Pirates rank among the highest earners in baseball, having pulled down $35 million last year, according to Forbes , in rankings released Wednesday.

That ranks 10th among the 30 teams in Major League Baseball, behind the St. Louis Cardinals ($40 million) and just ahead of the Arizona Diamondbacks ($34 million).

The Chicago Cubs reported an operating income of $102 million to lead MLB, according to Forbes.

Six teams lost money per Forbes' operating income estimates: the Miami Marlins ($53 million), Detroit Tigers ($46 million), Baltimore Orioles ($26 million), Kansas City Royals ($17 million), Seattle Mariners ($2.4 million) and Toronto Blue Jays ($1.3 million).

Forbes also reported the Pirates with a valuation of $1.26 billion, up from $1.25 billion a year ago.

The Tampa Bay Rays are the lone team valued at less than $1 billion. That's more than $3 billion less than the New York Yankees, who again topped the list.

There were seven teams –— the Royals, Marlins, Milwaukee Brewers, Cleveland Indians, Cincinnati Reds, Oakland A's and Rays — worth an estimated billion dollars or less in last year's ranking.

The overall value of all 30 MLB teams jumped more than 7 percent to an average estimated value of $1.645 billion this year.

The Rays are valued at just $900 million.

The Yankees' valuation was pinned at $4 billion, a billion more than the second-ranked Los Angeles Dodgers. The Cubs were third at $2.9 billion.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me