ShareThis Page

Pirates' Hanrahan shows he belongs

| Sunday, June 17, 2012, 12:30 a.m.
Christopher Horner
Pirates closer Joel Hanrahan celebrates his save against Washington Wednesday May 9, 2012 at PNC Park. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

Those Joel Hanrahan trade rumors have died down a bit, although the Pirates might yet deal their All-Star closer depending on how the season unfolds. But any offer likely would be one the club absolutely could not refuse.

“Our guys know that, once we get the ball to Joel, we're in a really good place,” manager Clint Hurdle said.

Going into the Pirates' weekend series in Cleveland, Hanrahan was in more of a quiet place. Not counting a maintenance outing against the Orioles, his last meaningful work through Friday was June 9 against Kansas City, when he got his 17th save in 19 chances.

Hanrahan was tied for sixth in the majors in saves and, if he is not among the game's elite closers, he's almost there. Since getting past a hamstring injury in April, he has converted 12 of 13 save opportunities with a 1.17 ERA. After yielding eight walks in his first eight games, he has walked two in his past 11.

“We knew he was dinged-up with his leg,” Hurdle said. “An (injury-free) season for a closer are few and far between. ... They're going to have games that get away.”

After beating out Evan Meek for the job during spring training last season, Hanrahan converted 40 of 44 save opportunities and made the All-Star team, going 26 for 26 in save opportunities before the break. Only twice before had a Pirates reliever posted 40 saves.

Although Hurdle downplays save totals, the number was impressive, figuring in well more than half of the Pirates' 72 wins.

“If you knew the names of the closers I've had in my managerial career, you'd know how comfortable I am with Joel, even when he's not at the top of his game,” Hurdle said.

Hanrahan, 30, said “nothing's changed” from last year, but there have been a few adjustments. His fastball velocity is down, but he still brings the heat with an average clocking of 96 mph. He is relying less on hard stuff and more on his slider. Last year, 83 percent of his pitches were fastballs, fifth among relievers. This year, he's been around 75 percent.

Even though Hanrahan has a higher strikeout rate than in 2011, “I like the fact that he's not getting caught up in strikeouts,” Hurdle said. “He's not trying to create some kind of pitch or spin that isn't there right now. His slider's in a good place. ... The fastball command is back in place. The velocity is firm and solid. Against a closer like him, an offense has got to show up with its ‘A' game to have a chance. When he doesn't get it done, that means the other team is probably above its game that day.”

This did not happen overnight. An ineffective starter as a rookie with the Nationals in 2007, Hanrahan was much better the next season as a middle reliever. A shaky start as Washington's closer in 2009 led to a trade: He and Lastings Milledge went to the Pirates at the end of June for Nyjer Morgan and Sean Burnett. Hanrahan improved dramatically that year and was solid in 2010, but he still had to wait his turn behind Matt Capps and Octavio Dotel before claiming the closer's role.

“Going into last year, I'd never really had success closing,” he said. “I was going out there sometimes questioning myself like, ‘How's this going to go?' You know you can do it, but you've got to see results. I had the results last year, so I could come into this year confident and feeling fine.”

Bob Cohn and Rob Biertempfel are staff writers for Trib Total Media. They can be reached at and

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.