Andrew McCutchen emerged as an MVP candidate by zipping past previous career bests in nearly every offensive category. But the typically swift center fielder is doing more harm than good when he tries to steal a base.
McCutchen was an adept base thief through the first three months of 2012, going 14 for 18 from April to June. Since July, however, he has just one steal in eight tries.
McCutchen was one of the game's best base-stealers during his first two seasons, swiping bags at a clip that easily topped the National League average. But his stolen-base percentage dipped last year and is the worst in baseball this season among players who have attempted at least 25 steals.
McCutchen has cost the Pirates a couple of scores, according to Stolen Base Runs, which compares the value of a runner's stolen-base attempts to that of an average baserunner:
Year SB CS SB Pct. SBR
2009 22 5 81.4 +0.9
2010 33 10 76.7 +0.3
2011 23 10 69.7 -0.4
2012 15 11 57.7 -1.8
NL Avg. (2009-12): 71.8 percent
McCutchen isn't the only Pirate struggling to plunder this season.
Jose Tabata (-1.8 Stolen Base Runs) is tied with McCutchen for the worst SBR total in the majors, while Neil Walker (-1.1) and Alex Presley (-0.9) also have attempted double-digit steals with little success.
The Pirates have the worst team stolen-base percentage (56) in the majors and bring up the rear in team Stolen Base Runs, through Friday:
Team SB CS SB Pct. SBR
Pirates 57 45 56 -6.9
Orioles 43 27 61 -3.3
Cubs 80 41 66 -1.7
Dodgers 87 37 70 -1.6
D'backs 75 44 63 -1.4
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.